【保存版】東京競馬場・全コース完全攻略｜距離別の狙い方を徹底解説

This might come as a surprise, but did you know that the difference between racecourses can have a big impact on the outcome of a horse race ? Are racecourses really that different? If a horse is strong, it should be able to win at any racecourse, right? [music] You can guess it if you just know it's Chiba. I

think many people feel this way . However, while differences in the racecourse are often overlooked in horse racing predictions, they are actually a very important factor. For example, in the recent G1 Arima Memorial, Cosmo Kiranda, a horse with odds of 120,000 to 1,000, ran a spectacular race to finish second, resulting in a high payout.

Actually, I myself had recommended Cosmo Kiranda as a long shot, but looking at its race record, it had run six races at Nakayama Racecourse, clearly indicating that it was a horse that excelled at Nakayama Racecourse. Even if a horse's ability itself isn't outstanding, it can completely transform when it returns to conditions that suit it

. As you can see, there are strengths and weaknesses in competitive environments. I'm fast at short distances, but I'm not good at long distances. I'm good at going downhill, but I'm not good at going uphill. Just like how someone might be good at right-hand curves but awkward at left-hand curves [music], there are

clearly conditions under which they excel and conditions under which they struggle. In horse racing, this is called "appropriateness" in music. No matter how talented or popular a horse is, it can easily finish outside the money if the conditions are unsuitable for it. This is by no means an unusual occurrence . For example, the Arimaki Memorial, where TP Impact, as you all know, was