AI Expert WARNS: "You're Not Ready For 2027"

Roman, state your argument. I agree with one thing you said, but I will define AI in a way that helps us. We are using the term AI for three completely unrelated technologies , which is probably the reason for this debate. AI is a useful tool, a simple technology that we have always had

, a finite system that keeps you more productive and creative. Everyone loves and supports it. I'm a computer scientist, an engineer, and I want this even more . It helps the economy, which is great. We know how to control them, how to keep them safe, and we understand what they do. I completely agree with that AI

. The AI ​​we are now coming to is GPT-6 level, human level, AGI level. We can argue about what that means . Some are dangerous , even for any human being . They are just as dangerous as a human being . But if they are introduced into the research cycle, they become autonomous

scientists and autonomous engineers . What are you saying? What does it mean to introduce them into the research cycle? Now humans are doing research to make GPT-7 . Yes. But they started adding AI tools . Most programming is being done by AI. The next parameter set is designed. And what if the entire

process was completely automated ? What happens if GPT-6 writes GPT-7 itself ? Is this what you call recursive self-improvement? Exactly the same. But it cannot be said for sure that this will happen . Many people, including all the top labs, are predicting this will happen . They are introducing a Junior Machine Learning

Researcher in 2026 . They plan to start this cycle in 2027 . That's when AI starts building new AIs . Yes, once the self- cycle begins , we create what is called ' super intelligence' . A