Supuestos filosoficos del poder disciplinar

Hello, my name is Más de Olivera. I am currently working on research for my final year project, and I wrote this article for the journalist. It stems from my thesis research. My article is titled " Philosophical Assumptions that Underpin Punishment in Foucault's Disciplinary Power and its Place in the Debate on Lowering the Age

of Criminal Responsibility in Argentina." Before delving into the body of the article, I would like to provide some context. This article addresses the debate surrounding lowering the age of criminal responsibility within the framework of Argentine juvenile justice. In Argentina, we have a law governing juvenile justice called the Minority Criminal Regime. This law was enacted

in 1980. If we consider the period between 1976 and 1983, during the military dictatorship, this law was written during that time. Therefore, it's important to consider the context in which these events occurred. The age of criminal responsibility is a key factor in this discussion. The age of criminal responsibility, which I will explain, is

set at 14 years of age with the return of democracy in 1983. The age of availability was raised to 16, and it remains so to this day. The debate, which will periodically occur in the media, is about whether to modify it or not. What I said in the article is that juvenile criminal justice deals with many issues,

but the most publicized aspect is the age of criminal responsibility. When discussing crime and minors, this issue is always brought up and emphasized. What has happened in our country since 1980, when this law was enacted, has been that different laws and international treaties have emerged that seek to defend children's rights. For example, in 1985, the Beijing Rules, the