Diversity of cultural expressions in the digital environment

that human intelligence could act also like the machine for the content production of a disguised plagiarism of inspiration constituting a major challenge to the intellectual property. So, and according to you, how? could we consider this ambivalence, if I may say so, between the creation and its simulation by inspiration, whether human or artificial?

Therefore, in order to be able to proceed with a distinction of contents in a way general of course and how rotten, could we strengthen the traceability by linking origin to rights author based on the reflection carried out as you You know it through the empire on heritage intangible cultural. Thank you. Thank you for your question. Is it that

Could you just summarize? your question so that we can To hear it again? In short, what are you do you want to highlight? In fact, it's just of us good to share with us your thoughts regarding the concept of creation and this dichotomy between creation and inspiration. And how can we or could we proceed to a

distinction of content on this basis ? Alexandra, thank you very much.

I love my iPad. It's been very useful. I just looked to look up the um the state of copyright in Asia. I'm very grateful to my iPad but My iPad doesn't love me back Unfortunately. It it just calculates when we're talking about human communication, what people are looking for fundamentally is connection to other human beings. This

is what people are looking for. Real emotions, real stories. A computer can never tell you what to be to be to be to be a black person from Africa. can it you can relate on human level to any uh computerized emotions. So in the end the proof is in the pudding and I'm very