la singularidad ¿Por qué no puede ser abordada por la ciencia?

Good evening. This video is about a text that Lizárraga and I wrote together, titled "Singularity Because It Cannot Be Addressed by Science." In this text, what we try to do is elucidate the concept of singularity, and we're going to look at two basic ways of considering it. First, let's start by distinguishing what we're going to

discuss, which is singularity, from the singular. We'll leave this term "singular" for its more logical sense, which is the sense it actually has. In Can-Can, for example, he considers judgments. In the classification of judgments, according to quantity, there would be three types of judgments: universal, particular, and singular. From there, he obtains the

categories of unity for universals, plurality for particulars, and totality for singulars. But let's stick with this classification of judgments. So here we see that singular judgments—that is to say, singularity is an attribute of judgments—are what have the property of being singular, not things or facts, but judgments. Now, let's recall another idea of ​​Cal, which

is knowledge. So, knowledge arises when a phenomenon, processed by the senses, is subjected to categories derived from the understanding, and this occurs in the object—that is, the phenomenon becomes an object. This is when knowledge is acquired. Therefore, we see that no phenomenon can be known as a singularity or as something singular, because

phenomena are not singular. " Singular," as we said, is a predicate of judgments, not of phenomena. Furthermore, when phenomena are known because we apply categories to them, the category itself precludes any possibility of singularity. How are we going to understand it? So, let's leave aside this sense of " singular" as a logical sense