Ceuta: el conflicto que no se resuelve #Shorts

The Ceuta conflict is making one thing quite clear. I don't want better politicians, I want to depend less and less on politicians, because the same thing always happens. Some parties respond to their structures, others to their electorates, others to prison groups, economic interests, bureaucracies, electoral incentives. And then a new elite appears saying,

"We do represent the people , so what do we do?" We replaced one set of elites with another. I don't want new saviors or to replace one caste with another caste with a different aesthetic, because the science of complexity teaches us something important. The more complex a system is, the more absurd it is to

claim that a small group at the top has all the information necessary to govern it. Hayek already intuited this with the problem of dispersed knowledge, and today we can take it much further. That's why I'm interested in liquid democracy. Imagine a system in which you do not hand over your sovereignty to a politician for 4 years.

You can vote directly on an issue, delegate your vote to someone higher up than you, and withdraw that delegation whenever you want. And through technologies like blockchain we could explore auditable and decentralized mechanisms for certain institutional functions without turning the technology into a magic bullet. What is the objective? Distribute power, knowledge, and

decision-making capacity. a democracy understood not as a pyramid, but as an adaptive network with multiple decision centers, feedback mechanisms, local experimentation and error correction. Because my political ideal is not to find the perfect ruler, it is to build institutions in which it matters less and less who governs. I don't want another elite to come and save me from the