Redação Oficial – Formalidade e Padronização

So now we're working on formality and standardization, okay? Let's then examine what the presidential style guide tells us about this. Let's go. Formality and standardization. Administrative communications should always be formal, that is, they must adhere to certain rules of form. There really needs to be this standardization, this formalization, right? Beauty? Awesome! This

applies both to communications made via electronic means, for example, email, documents generated by SEI, HTML documents, etc., and to any printed documents. So, the betting site sometimes likes to literally put this here, okay? So, be careful, okay? So you can see, she really likes literal interpretations, right? And another thing, it's not just Cebrasp exams,

okay? The other stalls like it too, right? The way to grasp the knowledge of official writing there is by focusing on the literal meaning, okay? So, be careful with that. A certain level of formality in address is still required, OK? And I underlined it for a reason, okay? It's not just about the correct use of

this or that form of address for an authority figure of a certain level. It is more than that; it is the formality of respecting civility in the very approach given to the subject matter of the communication. So it also concerns civility, OK? Formal treatment is also linked to the necessary uniformity of communications. So, if we're

talking about an official document with these attributes, it's natural that we have uniformity there. Do you agree? Now, if the federal public administration is unified, it is natural that the communications it expresses follow the same pattern. Establishing this standard requires attention to all the characteristics of official writing and also care in the presentation of the texts,