YouTube Instagram TikTok How it works FAQ

The fastest way to turn talking videos into clean, searchable text. Free, private and no account required.

About

Built by Rishav Raj with one goal: free transcripts for everyone.

rishav@yttotranscript.com

Transcribe

YouTube to text
YouTube with timestamps
Instagram Reels
TikTok videos

Learn

How it works
FAQ
YouTube transcripts guide

More

Chrome extension
Contact
Privacy policy
Terms of service

© 2026 YTtoTranscript. Made for creators & researchers.

Not affiliated with YouTube, Instagram or TikTok. Respect creators’ copyright.

Competência Vs Subserviência | 24/08/2026 — Transcript · YTtoTranscript

Home/Transcripts/YouTube

YouTube Transcript

Competência Vs Subserviência | 24/08/2026

Diogo Forjaz · 23,433 words · 117 min read · EN

Watch on YouTube

Share X LinkedIn WhatsApp

Below is the complete, readable transcript of Competência Vs Subserviência | 24/08/2026 by Diogo Forjaz on YouTube. Read the full text, copy any part you need, or generate a transcript for any video with our free tool.

เฮ

เฮ

เฮ

เฮ

เฮ

เฮ

เ เฮ

เฮ

เฮ

Good evening, everyone. Goodnight. We are live on Facebook, on YouTube, by exo Gerer for all states of Brazil, literally everyone. That's why, Actually, I'm not going to list them one by one, no. only in the capital cities, but how do you guys brincemente put all the answers in the comments nights also in the interiors. Go to

Transcribe another video

Paste any YouTube, Instagram or TikTok link to get a free transcript.

Free · No sign-up · Unlimited

Add to Chrome — transcribe in one click

Pari, you already know you like it, give it a like! So you don't forget and please share, Liking and sharing is just the beginning, no It costs nothing, and it helps a lot. He arrived by Okay, I checked it, verify your registration. Share it. Today we're going to talk about Competence versus subservience.

It seems that quality information and truly, the one that survives in time and that often feeds the same authoritarians who want Censoring her is really annoying. Annoying so much so that it was part of the speech of Minister Alexandre de Moraes recently, but it's not just about him, it's about how those in power view information.

truthful and a job well done. In view of of so many labels that we face recently, there have been many, the robot or the the hate cabinet or finally the fake news news. Now a new category to decategorize who demonstrates the lack of class of graduates. Now the influencer has arrived. Well, it's time to make a very clear distinction.

What is an influencer? What is a... journalist. in fact, not a straw or anything fake. And what is a political analyst? how can these things mix and more like how they evaluate themselves along the lines of time. Today, conveniently, the news of the day and the most relevant points They draw exactly that. So I had

a fantastic opportunity to strike back these statements that were made today precisely with the content that I already I would present it in today's live stream. Today we So let's talk about how much the questions that bother us need to be miscategorized by power. The difference brutal between subservience and what a The day was spent in a kind of cult-like atmosphere in the press.

religious to the powerful and journalism independent of the new era. What makes the Questions that bother us. And to illustrate Yes, I even have the line of time. Today's top news stories They go through this. Then I fasten my seatbelt. there. And today you will see perhaps with more clarity, because there is so much effort in

A world to silence the networks. Press the belt. Today, Today's conversation is going to be good, very good. Today Minister Alexandre Moraes himself acknowledged that most people They provide information via the internet, as I say, since 2019, refuted even by some of the pairs. Today they had to acknowledge bankruptcy of the disinformation system

Professional and organized. More than that, today they had to deal with the consequences of a political model bankrupt, which he acknowledged and which he used a of my arguments for talking about that. Sure, I don't know if the lines of The ministers were addressing me. specifically, but I think many perhaps good internet professionals

have felt the desire to bring the counterpoint that which does not exist in media master's degree. So today is a day of you, from us, to bring a more reflection wide. Fasten your seatbelts, because tonight... It promises, it promises a lot. Short, Share, verify your registration and monetize. Game. @gmail.com is the key.

Pix is also the key to PayPal, which is... The only way for you to monetize my... work. So I'm counting on you. the People have been surviving here for 7 years now. in a completely independent way For the last two and a half years directly, since the platforms considered the our harmful content and really to

To the powerful, it is truly harmful. Well, or not, right? or for those powerful people who have more awareness, They might even discover some things. important. After all, unlike some certified professionals, we know that is written on the Brazilian flag order and progress, not independence or death. Our reference point on this channel is

the text of the law, as it is written, without This talk about cold or reheated food, what's that all about? as it should be, as it was written for to be, anyway, Like, share, check your Sign up and monetize with any amount. I'm counting on you all. People, before I continue, while you mark

Like this video to verify your subscription and... monetize my work and ours space, uh, let me ask, you guys Do you prefer this way or that little sign that... Were you watching the live stream yesterday? Still on the subject of Yesterday's live stream, uh, there are some people questioning the advertisements that They showed up today, right? I already had

I've explained this before, but I'll... strengthen. Every time I don't I have enough time to apply for the license. opening of the live stream or that has some audiovisual content during the The broadcast can happen on YouTube. placing advertisements, despite the channel to be demonetized. And why YouTube? Does it do that? because he fears having to pay

the rights to that content, or the opening vignette of the live stream or to content that I may have passed on during the broadcast. And then in those In some cases, he places the advertisement even with The channel has been demonetized. That being said, I've already put it in today. permission, so if you are going to watch

Yesterday's live stream again, it's not happening anymore. Having the ads is okay, right? But no, we We are not monetized in any way. none. It was only yesterday, the live stream ended. Late, I still had to hit the road. And unfortunately, well, the team here doesn't... There was enough time and today was all day.

clumsy, busy, a series of movements and I didn't remember during the day of applying for the license, I just put it on. It's OK? So, is it a sign or something like that? Put it there. For now, I'll leave it at that. So, but in a little while... the term "federal deputy" will not remain.

readable. There's no way around it. She is small, There's no way around it. I've already given up on that one. She It won't be legible anyway. It won't work. Oh, these are the options that are... right now, or on the nameplate model. That's how it would be. Do you prefer the sign? It's a small sign, right?

I imagined.

Wonder. Let's get started, everyone. Let's go There, then. Without further ado, let's go. Short, Share and monetize. Just reminding you all that bank details pass through during The entire broadcast is real, folks. I sometimes speak in a more... automatic, more automated, but of The truth is, it's very, very important that You guys should monetize it. Think about

Next, the reach of all networks of The candidate has completely collapsed. Everyone is suffering because of this. Then, Like and share now, less that you want us to disappear Either I disappear or it's essential. But in these cases, then, monetization is even more important. The like, which is a click, I ask so many times and the

People forget. Imagine the monetization. which is not free and it's not a click away. So I ask you, once again. monetize as much as possible whenever you... If you can, that's fine. Regardless of the amount, no. It has a minimum, no maximum, and every day. whoever comes every night can give a a little help. The QR code is over here in the corner and the

bank details, including this key Pix is also from PayPal, Diogo. @gmailo.com kept scrolling down there. throughout the entire broadcast, okay? I'm going to do a in a little while. closed-minded about competence and subservience, but today, as for me I will continue to refute the misinformation. because it's the role that every journalist should do,

to bring the truth. I will continue analyzing Machiavellian strategies of mass manipulation and I will explain the the inner workings of these strategies, because that is the something every analyst should do. Pity that power is very spoiled with terrible professionals, weak in Character and competence. It's not mine. case. Okay, let's go then.

Let's begin our conversation today. Main news. According to the mismedia, liar, subservient, weak, incompetent and lame, the one who believes Have independence or death on the flag from Brazil. you badge maniacs, the fanatics, Graduates, as you wish. Let's go. United States imposes new sanctions on Iran. Trump puts pressure on world leaders. so that they cut off the negotiations. In

Oia magazine, United States listens, right? They give countries a deadline to break off business deals. with Iran under threat of sanctions. On G1, The United States announces dozens of sanctions against Iran threaten countries. who maintain economic relations with The Iranians. And on the leaf's little arm hygienic sector in São Paulo, dollar rises

five, rises at 5:15 and the stock market appreciates. with the Ibovespa in uncertainty. Okay, then The first segment discusses pressure. from the United States' perspective with regard to Iran, something that graduates, fanatics, Maniacs and journalists around the world were saying it was impossible. Okay, let's go back to clothing that is most pleasing to

powerful. Something that the main ones journalists and analysts from the media outlets Formal concessionaires said no. would happen. Many of them were waging war. against Iran as lost by the United States We've been together for many months now. What we What we see now is that Iran has lost all the their local allies and now the United States

United, in a moment of heightened pressure with regard to the Aatolah regime, including internally, they put pressure on the Europeans and even the Chinese abandoning the Iranian model or accept the consequences of defend the model. And this coincides precisely with the analysis. what have I done here since October 7th? 2023, when the attack against occurred

Israel. That's the big difference. My analyses, and I comment primarily on them. not only do they survive, but they are confirmed in time, and these aren't just guesses. Or proverbs, they are details. I gave details how would the United States promote the isolation in the Middle East for the Iranian regime. Point by point. How does he

would tie together economic interests and productive. More than that, I already I saw Russia's participation in this process and how she had been preparing for this shift in the axis of the East Average. I had already drawn it like the countries in the region would form a model. which would be the example to replace the

UN. Gaza would be an example of this. unity among the countries of the Middle East And the United States? how this agreement it would take shape before becoming public in Saudi Arabia, like Putin He was supposed to meet with Trump there. This also happened as little by little the old allies of Iran would isolate itself and how the threats of

Iran's violence would make its former... allies of their adversaries. This also happened. Then external influence would be pressured both by the crisis of oil, which is not a problem for the United States, as well as through relations political and diplomatic. And that's what's happening now. It arrived a moment when the United States gives

Checkmate in Iran. Either he surrenders or He will surrender. And more important than the The economic damage that this blockade will cause to cause a country that is already facing severe economic problems are the damage political, since either Iran will lose completely the support that remained to him, or the support that remains to him will have to

dealing with the consequences with the rest of the world. And that is the dilemma that China faces. now. Precisely As I analyzed it, which would be in detail. since October 7th and with much emphasis on Peace Council before it was announced. Which is why, incidentally, on the day the Council was announced Peace, I put it on the cover of the broadcast.

It's only there on the announcement date, the UN symbol and the Council symbol of Peace, a model that is repeated in Ukraine, as I said it would be, and if Repeat here. So yes, I can't. Speaking for others, but I comment on... Ukraine, even football, if I have Interest, because I have demonstrated that I

Consistency is key to doing this. Intelligence and consistency It's not for everyone. I know. We continue. Flávio confirms his presence at the debate. From Jornal Nacional. Globo does series of interviews with candidates for presidency. See dates and how to watch. Flávio did not attend the debate. irrelevant, as I even suggested that he would do something that it wasn't true. Great

that he listened to my suggestion, Or not, right? Or perhaps you thought about it. same thing, but that's good, because the My analysis of the debate also I was correct. The main focus of other candidates were just trying to wear down the Flávio in every way possible and imaginable, since those who Those who still vote for Lula are not subject to

to change your mind for any reason, already that's all the reason not to vote for him They are public and affect people's pockets, the stomachs, refrigerators and also the lives of all Brazilians. Therefore, voting for Lula is no longer a rational decision. That being said, there is no no reason for his wear and tear

in the debates, have some impact on the face of his electorate. The analysis then was that irrelevant candidates would just to spend Flávio's money and build the perception that Lula is possible to win. Look, she was right about that. new. Without Flávio Bolsonaro in the debate of the irrelevant ones, they were left without having the

What to do. We didn't see that debate. proactive among those who were there, the their proposals, counter-proposals, no. There was a failed attempt to attack the image from Flávio, and so it wouldn't seem like it was only... against him, against Lula. The audience for the debate was the smallest. Audience of the year. And like me too

I expected that it would happen, without Flávio, the Brazilians weren't there. And without them Brazilians there, well, the irrelevant ones. They demonstrated what they truly are. irrelevant. Now, when Flavio confirms that he will attend the interview with the newspaper. Nationally, he demonstrates that he doesn't have fear, has no fear whatsoever of answering what

Whatever it may be. He just won't expose it. your visibility to fuel wear and tear in research which we don't find in the real world. That's all. Even the most wounded voter for the past few years, which sometimes seeks the encouragement in diverse speeches, I would still vote for Jair Bolsonaro if he...

were free from the state captivity it has become your own home. That's the point. While the irrelevant people were giving speeches among themselves empty speeches against those who they were not, even their sponsors or their vice presidents They were sleeping, right, Cassab? After that failure, A sign that Flavio was right. No There was no reason for Flavio to go to

debate of irrelevant things. And now he confirms that he will attend the interview with the newspaper. National. that they ask the questions they want. Right? Then we'll see once again why the Journalism is dead. Who discredits the media outlets themselves press. Will the press ask... Lula on the processes he is facing He was convicted and never exonerated.

What corruption devastated the country? I think No. Will they ask about the impacts of the Lava Jato scandals that continue to unfold outside the country, as the first lady of Peru that he rescued or the case of Passadina that It is being investigated again. Perhaps the case from the port of Mariel in Cuba

They won't go either. Will they ask? about Lula's son in the center, at the central point of a diagram influence peddling that appears in more than one investigation and inquiry with millionaire figures among the most powerful? Will they question the Lula on the secret meetings with Daniel Vorcário, on the orientation for that he wouldn't sell the bank to BTG.

André Esteves? And regarding the fact that Victor, from the Victor group, which laundered money with The PCC, and Lula's son was there. even from lobbying, like a consultant Victoressa, where Lula hired her, He appointed the director of the time as his The council will go on until 2027. Will it... The press will ask about the son.

from him, about Luke Singer, who said that Would he have offered her any position? Will they ask about the pass? The freedom she had during Lula's government. or about the monthly meeting that the son had with his father or about the dialogues that Do they mention entering the circles of power? It will be

who will question Lula about the dinner at the home of Minister Alexandre de Moraes in an unconstitutional manner, from the point of view of from a criminal constitutional perspective, it violates the separation of powers, violates the prerogatives of the office of minister of The Supreme Federal Court together with Senate President Davi Columbri,

to decide on governance and this was public. It will be? Will they question the fact that even David Columbri and the same Alexander Moraes having shared cigars and the Macalan whisky with Daniel Vorcaro in London, funded by Daniel himself. Vorcaro? I don't think so. And that's the point that It discredits the media. Maybe they

Ask a lot about the private film. Dark Horse, with private funding for the Dark Horse, duly declared for Dark Horse, without any quid pro quo. Bolsonaro family's policy for The one who invested in Dark Horse. But perhaps they are not so worried. with money stolen from old people or with the 25 million that Lula's son

would have received, according to the CPMI or the board. of 300,000, or even about the mansion in Brasilia with a rent of R$ 28,000, negotiated by Luxinger, but signed by the caretaker of the Atibaia property, the property of a friend of Lula's, Fernando Bitar, who also happens to be in WhatsApp conversations between Lulinha and...

Luke Singer on influence peddling. That's why the press doesn't have credibility. That's the reason. That's all. Gin authorizes the Federal Police to access data from operation against the film production company about Bolsonaro. As I just said.

The press will now look for any something that can be put on Flavio's account and then he doesn't know why he doesn't have it credibility. Unfortunately, the lack of credibility of the media Brazilian has very little to do with new media. It has more to do with herself. United States Supreme Court gives

victory for the Trump administration by vote. mail. Well, there's a Trump project. to organize the elections there and it's full of mess, but There is a decree, an executive order from Trump, who was already seeking to secure the security, at least in the vote for mail. There was a questioning of constitutionality and the Supreme Court

The American decided yes, it is constitutional Trump's decree. It's not a decree, it's a executive order, but it has the same function. So, for now, temporarily, there is protection of the executive order. But Trump has already worked towards a more solution definitive, which is a solution legislative, because in a state In a democratic system governed by the rule of law, the law prevails. AND

The law is produced by those who have it. constitutional power to legislate, the legislative. And that's a point that they ministers of the Federal Supreme Court Brazilians solemnly ignore the Constitution. I'll show you that today. new. Perhaps that's why serious work... like mine and so many others bother you so much so, because we deliver to the population.

the knowledge that graduates They either hide it or they simply don't have that kind of power. your incompetence. Let's look at the main ones in Brazil. Federal Police will have access to NGO information. linked to the production company of the film about Jair Bolsonaro. Ancine grants registration to Dark Horse, cinematography by Jair

Bolsonaro. Ancine authorized it because it is Everything is in order. G1. Police São Paulo Civil Court receives Supreme Court decision. and has 5 days to share data of operation targeting NGO linked to film about Bolsonaro. Here they are. trying to link to the film production an investigation into points of internet in the municipality of São Paulo, in

that the individual responsible for the NGO She is also a partner in the company related to film production. So this is the only one. The point of connection between the two facts. Or That is, there is no direct connection. between the internet access points in the capital that this NGO would have subcontracted someone

to make and the movie is Dark Horse no It has no financial connection. contractual or reciprocal. The only The common point is that the individual is from production company. the same individual partner from the production company, is also the individual He/She is responsible for the NGO. Basically it is That's the key point here. What are

Headlines do, so there's no... credibility, they lie. This is a way sophisticated way of lying. It is created in the reader the perspective that the film is investigated in some way or that These documents refer to the film. And no, They refer to internet access points. Something that has already been clarified, but the

The press solemnly ignores something that already It was clarified when they approached it by first time and they publish again headlines that sell a vision again distorted view of the facts. If this is not Misinformation, so I don't know what it is. What good is having a diploma if you don't have... decency, ethics, professional ethics,

character to use it or competence same. Choose either the media that is profoundly incompetent, or the media who is deeply bad-natured, Or perhaps a mix of both. Ultimately, in the concept of fake news that the The Supreme Court tried to legislate in Brazil, they They would be here inducing people to a conclusion of information that is known

False. It is already known that there is no direct relationship or nor directly related to the case of the points of Internet in the city of São Paulo and the movie. This is what discredits the press. AND That's why people don't watch it. more. We continue. New Nexus BTG research from André Esteves indicates a tight scenario in

first round of elections. Research They show the distance between Lula and Flávio. in the three largest electoral colleges of country. And that's another reason why not It has no credibility whatsoever. Brazil lives the biggest economic crisis of the last 50 years years. The economic crisis we are experiencing now it is more serious and deeper than

that the crisis caused by Dilma. For the first time, more than half of The country depends on government aid. One aid that decreased in size in practice due to inflation. You poorer Brazilians have found It's very difficult to get food, to pay. the most basic accounts. And among the class On average, work has disappeared in

practice. Small business owners They are facing a recession crisis. consumption was also unprecedented. And when life gets too heavy, there is which to see, including in the media, the idea of It's just a feeling. Inflation It has decreased, the food that is missing in your A refrigerator is just a feeling. The money

What's left to pay the month's bills is just a feeling. The job you lost or unable to recover It's just a feeling, too. The deficit of A government that overspends is also just a A feeling, you know? And based on that feeling, they still They insist on saying that the government responsible for all of this, who is listed in

five of the biggest new scandals of world politics, including tragedy against the Brazilian kids remains in front.

That's why it lacks credibility. Look, nobody on the internet would need to. to open one's mouth to discredit the desmid. The disconnection The regime has become so powerful that it doesn't even... You need to point it out more. Anyone who can complete a sentence understands the chaos the country is experiencing. with great clarity and knows who it is

responsible for this, right? Anyway, What else? Mora says that the system proportional representation has failed, argues the vote. mixed district system. I separated the video for I won't comment on that. now, but you will realize that perhaps the minister watched Live, maybe. After all, while much of the right wing whole, what they call extremist

or far-right, argues openly the pure district vote or mixed-member proportional representation system. Although I understand The model is fantastic, an excellent one. This model is used by several countries around the world. model, including the United States. I I argued about how this works in Brazil. would strengthen political parties and I explained why. I'll explain again.

And the reason why the minister defends the mixed district voting in their own words, it's because politics has lost its... representation, there is no longer a connection with the parties. It is necessary to resume party affiliation. In other words, his argument is that the The political system and the parties lost. strength and that a mixed district vote, in

His suggestion would strengthen the parties. politicians to take power away from internet deputies who are more more concerned with doing live streams than with defend the population, that is, the vote of machine. He brought exactly what I needed. argument. The reason why I think that It shouldn't be Brazil at the moment, no.

is prepared for the district vote was precisely the reason he used for defend the district voting system, because it He wants the strongest parties. Stronger parties mean in this context. moment, societies, a more weak. But this is just to leave you with a nice taste in the spin. I'll bring them right away.

words. from the minister and I will to contextualize them properly, including the analysis that I I even wrote about it here. Perhaps the work here is good. In the end, This appeared in the minister's argument. What else, Alexandre de Moraes? This model The election failed. It went bankrupt. I say this Since 2020, right? The chiefs did not

They understood. It went bankrupt. There is a need for political reform. Morais says so, right? The question is which one, right? Which political reform? What else? PEC 6 por 1. government leader in Congress plans to vote next week. fourth. Wow, who could have imagined that the analysis I did here when the The proposal is becoming increasingly clear that in

second half of August the proposal I would return And it was when she returned, that once that she would return in the second half of In August, her approval would come into effect. September so that the electoral effects would be explored in the research without the government had to deal with the consequences

It's obvious that this measure What a stupid thing it will bring to Brazilian society. AND curiously That's exactly what's happening. This is serious work. That's why I can talk about everything. from the Corinthians game until Ukraine, because what I'm saying has consistency, is based on the text of the law, in the text of the Constitution, in the facts

public, in much study, much study, to the point of understanding the minds of the excellences of power and to anticipate them. Hadad promises body cameras. Working. Hadad says he won't sell. illusion about restatization. Better to switch manager. Hadad says Tacisio signed. contracts that are detrimental to the treasury. Exclusive interview with a group.

The whole thing is talking about irrelevant things. Fernando Haddad. How beautiful, right? Oh, guys, Natasha's been here for a long time. Time flies, Natasha! She needed to Unsubscribe and subscribe again to Find me. Do you understand why I I keep stressing the importance of you marking the Like, share a lot, check Your registration? Why do work?

Getting paid in Brazil is expensive. You if you turns a problem for those who are not used to dealing with seriousness. So, strengthen, verify Register now, check the box. as much as you can. I'm counting on you. What else, Squid? Target the month and make purchases more flexible. public works without bidding. INSS joins the

program Contrata Mais Brasil for Building maintenance and repairs. Government Lula tries to expand monthly hiring. by ministries and state-owned companies near election. You must think that's all. It's electioneering, isn't it? But it's not. While You weaken employers with each more and more taxes and with the market Internally increasingly weak, open the public procurement of micro-enterprises encourages

empty these employers and remove their contracts that maintain jobs. Contrary to what one might imagine, the expansion for the month at that point, in context in which the country finds itself, It won't help the workers. It will harm them terribly. to harm them terribly. What else? Lobbyist threatened to stop paying Tickets for Lulinha to pay for 100,000.

It's the small state that puts it in place to pay for it. 100,000 per month at home. Federal Police points it out. Lulinha's defense says: "Oops, stop Load here. Lobbyist received significant sums of money. in cash and paid for tickets in cash. "Lulinha's [Lula's son]", says the Federal Police. Federal Police say that Roberta Luxinger

would have paid for Lulinha's ticket in species. lobbyist allegedly threatened to cut Lulinha's expenses point to investigation. Meanwhile, Lulinha's lawyer, after meeting with Lula, the same who met with ministers, that's the matter. public, with Supreme Court justices, among they, Alexandre Moraes, for weaken Mendonça, which is what he is investigating. Yes, the lawyer said it was a

Bolsonaro supporters' persecution of the police Federal, without evidence and if it weren't for the Lulinha, the one under investigation, everything would be Archived. receive hundreds of thousands of reais in lobbying exchange with all the indications that I just quoted it. These are not indications. relevant to the investigation. So I I don't know what it is.

The same individual who finds it relevant investigating private money without counterpart in a film and that he investigates, he thinks that these The evidence is not enough. And if only the controlled, subservient media, incompetent, graduated, were covering the case, perhaps these questions If annoying people didn't come, right?

What else? Morais says that simply increasing penalties is not enough. It solves the problem of organized crime. Supreme Court justices signal that they may to block sections of the anti-fascism law and They advocate for dialogue with Congress. And that That's another problem. It is not up to the Supreme Court. Federal Court or its members evaluate

the political quality of decisions politics, since you weren't elected none of that. The Constitution is very clear in the articles 1, 2, first article, second article 5th, articles 38, 39 and 48, unless I'm mistaken, establishes the competencies of legislative and we could also go to the powers of the Supreme Court Federal government directly. Yes, the Supreme Court.

cannot, in your judgment, on the merits. politician, interfere in the decision of legislative, much less, much less propose political dialogue with The political house is here to deal with this. This is a constitutional violation. direct and none of the trained ones of The media will question the obvious. But obviously, it's not appropriate, minister of

Supreme Court, do that. I'm not the one saying it. that. It is the constitutional text itself. They cannot analyze each other, block sections and nor open a dialogue with Congress. Congress should not engage in any dialogue about legislative act. What if the Supreme Court understands? which is something unconstitutional, when provoked to do so and not by his own

initiative, as demonstrated by C in Headline, can eventually declare unconstitutionality based on the text constitutional. That's all. legislate judgment on the merits The Supreme Court understands that it will not be effective. then he blocks it. It doesn't have that power. Morais says vanity hinders integration. between security agencies. Honestly, He is a minister of the Supreme Court.

Federal government evaluating the organization Brazilian state policy publicly, without being provoked to such. And even if it was provoked, the The minister's reaction should be: it is not This assessment falls under the Supreme Court's jurisdiction. direct it to the appropriate legislative body, like the Supreme Court justices in the States United States usually does when they

questioned about political merits.

Discord appeals the suspension of live streams and says applied a disproportionate punishment. Brazil's new social media sheriff, agency view WhatsApp, Instagram, GPT chat and Facebook. Yes, that's the National Agency, the NPD, That's also unconstitutional. guitar Article 5, paragraph 4, section 11th, 14th, and so on. violates article 220 in its entirety, consequently, by

Violating these also violates the article. first, overriding the legislator, who even he I could do it. Anyway, It is an attempt to institutionalize Censorship and what started with Discord. that nobody should care too much because almost nobody uses it, at least not The average, everyday Brazilian. Now, As expected, it's already starting to...

expand the tentacles to all other social networks. That says a lot, since that attempt to expand the scope of censorship This comes along with the discourse that any influencer It suddenly distorts the debate. We'll talk about that in a moment. Anyway, Constitutionally speaking, the decisions These actions by that agency are unconstitutional. illegal and, from the perspective of the legislation and

Not mine, criminals. violate fundamental rights that are guaranteed by an entrenched clause. But Diogo, but what about the crimes? committed, they must be punished. criminals, Not the media. We've already talked about it. about this often, but you don't can punish the phone company because someone uses the phone to to commit fraud or a hoax. You

will punish the fraudster, Not a telephone company. If someone promotes a homicide with the Car parked on a public road, you will sue. the murderer, not the vehicle manufacturer, Neither the company responsible for the asphalt. It's the same thing. It is up to the state to do to enforce the law in all physical spaces

and digital. Anyway, The week begins freezing with temperatures of -9°C south. Oh, how envious I am. Free flow. Brazilian driver's license It will now display tickets and how to pay for them. electronic toll. Flávio confirms the presence at the Senate hearing. We've already commented on this. Briefly, the dispute for the two spots of

São Paulo in the Senate, according to new search. The polls for the Senate t Insisting on something brutal, right? The Tarcísio effect boosts the right wing and shuffles the Senate race in São Paulo Paul. Derrite, Tebet, Prado and Marina They are tied in the race for the Senate. I already I explained it to you earlier and these

explanations It's inclusive, beaten again, right, since the at the beginning, before the research, that they They would use the Senate polls to to confuse your perception about the presidential polls. That's because in São Paulo, for example, the Tarcísio wins in the first round. Then, how could it be with Tarcísio winning in Lula suddenly won the first round.

I don't know, half the votes in São Paulo, How can something like that be justified? No from the. So what are they trying to do? to create? I analyzed it beforehand and everything has been Confirmed now. serious work. They They want to detach Bolsonaro's ideology from Tarcísio. To say that Tarcío has Yes, I vote, but it's not a vote.

For a Bolsonaro supporter, it's a pragmatic vote. What this pragmatic vote, not a Bolsonaro vote. I could vote for Tarcísio in São Paulo and give him the victory in the first round and not voting for Flávio for president, that this vote could be either null or white, or parts thereof, including in Squid. Hence the attempt to put the

Marina Silva, a leftist, and Simone Tevit, who nobody knows who he is in São Paul, in a position of equality with André do Prado and Derit, trying to create a separation, dividing, splitting, who is Tarcísio, the which is illogical and irrational, since 99% Tarcísio's voters will vote for Derhit and André do Prado. First

because Derrite is part of the government of Tarcíio, they approve, so it's no longer the case. It would make sense not to vote for him. Second Because Tarcísio is a Bolsonaro supporter. He made a point of emphasizing this during the campaign declared who praises and acknowledges Jair's merits Bolsonaro. These merits have been recognized.

throughout its electorate, including in your networks. There are no criticisms of Jair. Bolsonaro or Bolsonarism on social media from Flá do do Tarcísio. Therefore, It's obvious, obvious that both André do Prado how far ahead Derit is. It's obvious that Lula is involved, and that Marina is too. Silva and Simone Tebet probably they don't even occupy

the third position, since there aren't that many anti-right-wing votes so in a state where Tarcísio wins in the first round so that two anti-right candidates had a position relevant. Hence the need to lie. Regarding the Senate, it's not just about... to reduce the number of seats in the Senate, such as People are thinking. The main focus is

distort your perception of the national elections. Proof of this, which I anticipated with precision. How would Fernando behave? Hadad in the debate with Tarcísio. And before Regarding the debate, I said here in this live stream, in day of the debate, which if my reading about the intentions to lie about the If the Senate's assumptions were correct, the Aadad

would invest their time praising some things about Tarcísio and trying to separate the Tarcísio of Bolsonarism. And that's exactly what he did in the debate. whole.

Ter São Paulo maintains ineligibility of Marçal's talk until 2032. We've already talked about it. about that. Cassab claims that he never He spoke of supporting Lula in a possible future event. second round. After Cassabe's nap During a TV debate, Caiado says that Brazilians will sleep peacefully just the same. to his deputy. Well, he fell asleep because the debate

He was loving, there was nothing to debate. right? They needed every possible way. To wear down Flávio, and he didn't. Therefore, it was a pointless event. With Regarding Cassab saying that it's never He spoke of his support for Lula in the second round. Cassab, respect our intelligence. All your commitment, yours and your party's,

their joints since 2023 have been in in order to enable governance. Lula's all the time. All of yours The movements so far have been in the direction of to wear down Jair Bolsonaro, the Bolsonarism, at the expense, including of Innocent people who were arrested. you know who are innocent. So don't think that at this point the

People don't know who you are or you he did. People decided, at the request of Jair, why do you keep trying? destroy, at his request, the people temporarily revealed the role what a disastrous thing you have in recent history. of the country. That's the truth. When Jair Bolsonaro in his eagerness, in his despair

to alleviate the suffering of those people who were arrested, ignoring the forum appropriate, the presumption of innocence, the individualization of criminal liability, among other other international parameters of human rights, in desperation of to alleviate the suffering of those people so that canalometry, I mean, calharometry, I mean pilantrometry, if the dosage method were approved, despite being

a horrible measure, reducing the sentence of innocent, but so that these people so they would suffer less, he agreed to stop. expose you, imagining that you had some political word and that was really to be applied to these people, but not That's what happened. They blackmailed Jair in every way possible. and after approving the measure, the partner

The politician from the Centrão (center-right bloc) held onto the stroke of a pen. illegally as well. The decision of Minister Alexandre de Moraes prevented that pelanthrometry, I mean, dosimetry was applied to reduce suffering of these people. So yes, there was a request from him personally. Jair very reluctantly, but prioritizing the people's lives.

disarmed the pressure that already existed against you, Cassabe, in the political and social spheres. So, people know who you are and What is your role in all of this? happening. The tax reform had its fundamental role, which it now destroys The lives of Brazilians and the powers of the political process itself. The same applies.

for the fiscal dungeon, for so many others abusive measures. The absence of The reaction to the abuses of the TOGA has the role fundamental of its joints for to prevent the advancement of requests for impeachment or even the awakening of political process that was involved gradually through the amendments parliamentarians to become hostages of

money they took, just like I did I warned you. And contrary to what you I imagined that all this coordination wasn't It would affect you, but now you know that That's not quite right. Today, K knows that the threats haven't stopped. in the middle spheres of political power, right? As I also warned. Anyway,

so there's no point in saying you never supported it Lula in a possible second round. Use Bolsonaro uses all means to spend money. now. This means justifying in polls indicate a victory by a small margin. Lula's difference in the second round. And if This is not working for Lula. second round, so I don't know anymore.

that is. Simple. I'm still waiting for the incisive speeches from your candidate, Ronaldo Caiado, about the scandals involving the son of Lula, those I mentioned at the beginning of this live. I'm also waiting for the positions. effusive comments against the multi-million dollar contracts of the ministers of the Supreme Court Federal or their families with Daniel

Vorcaro, the exchange of messages, the Sponsored trips, shared whisky or the coincidence of the authorities involved in the destruction of Bolsonarism, all seated at the table with The Macalan whisky in London. But about That's right, we haven't seen the position yet. effusive of candidates who don't want Working for the PT, right? We will most likely not even see it.

What else? Calil resumes campaign after transplant. cornea specialist, meets with military police. Okay, then There it is. Caliil performed the transplant, okay? good? Everything's fine with him, he resumed... campaign. What else? STJ defines circuits for filter operation relevance. The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) is becoming more distant and its more precedents close to the companies. STJ approves new

rules for relevance analysis in special resources and the judiciary follow organizing as he pleases himself judiciary. That's how it happened, right?

Real time. Tarcíio would win the dispute first. shift with 52%ad 35. Notice that when Haddad only has 35% of the votes, according to their polls, and Tarcísio is 52, I repeat, according to the Their research is unsustainable, Marina. and Tebet tying with the candidates of Tarciso. It is absolutely unsustainable.

They know this because they do it then to try to fabricate in response to the support for the is unsustainable national election. That's the goal. AND to say something like: "Look, I know I can do it." including imagining the words from analysts, mainstream journalists clearly. Yes, and here and here the research indicates

a distinction. Although Tarcísio has 52% of the votes, when we go to the map of In the Senate, there is a tie between the two. non-Bolsonaro candidates, Tebet and Marina Silva from the left and the candidates right-wing. This outlines a portion of Tarcísio's electorate, who votes for pragmatic result of his government and

Not because of ideology. This also appears in the search for President of the Republic, when the candidate, although candidate Haddad has With only 35% of the votes, candidate Lula 40 borders. And we have a large abstention in the presidential election that This is not observed in the election for government. of the state.

That's what you created this for. Inconsistency in the Senate. What can I say about that? Because I anticipated it. I'm not justifying it after it happened. I I warned beforehand that this would be exactly the case. what you would do, that's what you they were doing, that the construction would be that before it happens.

I am not accommodating my opinion. after. That's the difference. My livelihood does not depend on a straw or from a vehicle. She is in the facts. before, during and after. Moreover, if the powerful had paid attention... Pay attention to what I said earlier, no. They would be in the situation they are in now.

But I'll talk about that later. Just a little bit. What else? Caiado and Renan emerge as leaders, Flávio loses ground. Lula is strong and resilient. And they consulted 12 voters. I don't know how many they consulted. So the debate with the lowest audience of A story that nobody saw. According to Election polls have damaged Flávio's image.

In other words, they were following the narrative. Ready. If Flávio were to attend the debate, They would say that the questions and the wear and tear diminished Flávio and They strengthened the irrelevant ones. And it has More, huh? I anticipated what it would be. A narrative about the irrelevant, that only a portion of the electorate

irrelevant would go to Flávio and that The remainder would either go to blank or null. Squid. And look, the same research, the same... False polls said today that of Adolfinho's voters you can't talk about vaccines, the Adolfinho's voters, the voters of Eh Caiado and company, 50% would go to Flavio, 2/4, 25% They would either annul their vote or cast a blank vote.

for president. and 25% would vote for Lula. Do you know what it is? More curious? without having researched nobody, because the research, in my opinion, understanding, they do not depend on research, but of interest. Just by reading the map of interests, I said they would say exactly that And I explained. They place the candidates from

a way of saying that of those votes that already They belong to Flávio, but they delegate them. These irrelevant things, as if they if they were included in the polls, only half will Flávio in the second round. The remainder, half, 1/4 goes to zero and 1/4 Go to Lula. And that was exactly it.

the proportion and it was exactly the proportion that the Research has shown this. In other words, or curiously The map of interests of the powerful has been struck. with the research and me, by an act Esoteric, I managed to anticipate what the People would think, and what would that be like? compatible with the interests of power,

or the research does not reflect what the People think, but rather the interests of power. And so, then, I would have achieved, demonstrating factually the interests of power, anticipate the research.

Serious work. Analysis. Moro leads the first round in Paraná, but He draws with Sandro Alex in the second round. More an attempt to lessen the effect devastating that Flávio achieved in state of Paraná. When Flavio in Paraná hugged Sérgio Moro removed his name from the polls. main tool for emptying the Flávio in the state.

The middle players, they lost. It's impossible to say that part of the vote of Flávio is with Moro and only 50% will go for Flávio, and then 1/4 goes to Lula. and 1/4 for empty space, since they are together. This almost gives away the the entirety of Moro's votes to Flávio, regardless of what the research

I mean. So, now that it's not It is more possible to segregate Moro's vote into Regarding Flavio, what was left for... regime? What is the alternative? reduce I live here, but if it's not possible to reduce it in first round, since they delivered the He is the non-Bolsonaro right-wing voter. who is now with Flávio, what

Therefore, expectations have been reduced. second round and try to use the reserves of non-voters to justify this maneuver. That's what's happening.

What else? We were naive to think that bigtexes were "Neutral," says Morais. In São Paulo, Morais criticizes influencers, they don't know about What are they talking about? Well, I can't. Speaking for the other ministers, I can Speak for me. I know what I'm talking about. Speaking of Ukraine, and if I wish... even football, because what I'm saying

This has been confirmed over time. But it's the main topic, I'll get into it. In a little while. What else? End of fee The blouses will be announced next fourth. The end of the blouse tax will be... announced on Wednesday. Lula created the fee and now he takes the fee that he He even created it. And the research will pretend

dementia, pretending that nobody knows that He was the one who set the rate, which Jan already said one of the stupidest things of all time. history, in which the rate only affects companies to try to cover it up for The rate that her husband helped her to put him in the country and they'll pretend he has it.

some electoral recovery from from that. Then he doesn't know why he doesn't have it. credibility. Simple as that. Beauty? Simple as that, it is not? Very good. What else? Research Quest. Jorginho Melo leads the race for governor of Santa Catarina. Notice. And here's another point. That's important, right? What I drew that It would occur across the entire map.

Nationally, that's what's happening. on the national map, almost in its In terms of integrity, the right is in the lead. virtually all states. Then, Which path did they choose? To reduce regional differences in order to justifying the victory by a small margin at the level national. And that's exactly what they're doing. in all states.

What else?

Then there's a whole block trying to stir up fights within the family Bolsonaro. Don't count on me for that. I will not do it. that. Let me make this very clear. In fact, I know that periodically it happens. people who do this job of to investigate and everything else and so on, but I

I'm not going to get involved in that because now... It's very disruptive. Everything they deliver material to distort the panorama Overall, the electoral situation is bad and I'm not going to to participate in this. At no time I participated, but I won't do it again. No It doesn't matter where it comes from or what it is.

Let me make it perfectly clear, let me warn you now, with all due respect. respect for all people involved I'm not going to get involved in these disputes. because this goes against what we what we need at the moment and in contrast to which Flavio himself established Bolsonaro. I saw people sending it to me.

criticism of Flávio, sincerely. That won't work, will it? To criticize Flávio, Jair's candidate, that won't work. No, don't count on me for that. Whoever wants to do it, let them do it, I'm not going to. to do. Don't count on me. beauty? And who is interested in this type? of content or debate, with all the

With all due respect, there are other channels, other people who like this, work this way That kind of thing, and whenever you want to discuss it. That sort of thing, go ahead. Here we are debate what I understand to be the most serious issue and This isn't serious right now. Beauty? OK. What else?

That's all for Brazil. He finished. Now there is only one gang. It's a festival of repeats.

A festival of repeat performances. Nothing to do with anything. Okay, let's go. to see what's out there in the world so we can embark on today's general reading. Then Let's go. Like, share, and monetize. What's the price, guys? Anyone. Game. @gmail.com. It's the Pix key. It is also PayPal key. And in Pix or PayPal.

You monetize my work and guarantee... I hope we can see each other again tomorrow. For just one minute he'll look huge! here. He'll disappear in a little while. Short, Share, monetize. With absolutely I'm counting on you for any amount. Beauty? Wonder. Let's go. The Trump administration has not ruled it out. to use military force against Iran

again. It's on G1, in Oia magazine. States United States gives countries a deadline to break away. Business with Iran under threat of sanctions. Iran says the country is facing many difficulties amid sanctions from the United States. that on R7, States United States sanctions approximately 50 companies and 30 individuals with alleged links to

Iran. As I had anticipated, This was an important step, in fact. In the same way that he used Russia as a pivot to weaken the bricks using sanctions against Russian oil or whoever bought it. He did that too. with regard to Iran for the BCS, but it did more than that. He does so much in Cuba.

The same measure applies in Iran. What measure Is this it? He creates a map of consequences for natural persons and legal entities involved in the businesses that support these regimes. What is the relevance? from that? He makes the map public. connections between these regimes. These companies These are the people, sometimes NGOs, that

They work and bring resources, money and Business doesn't work for these dictatorships. alone and not far from people in the political arena. What Trump what he's doing is publicly creating the mirror between the map of political power and the map of economic power, which together they maintained these arbitrary regimes. It's a risky move, but very...

intelligent. We already expected this map to be... to expand.

Beauty? And that's exactly what it is. Happening now. This means the non-state arm political protection for these individuals It is now exposed. and it is exposed anyway, in That's true, isn't it? That is to say, these individuals will have to to answer about that. It's not just the financial hardship that is... important, but it's the exposure that he

generates. The exhibition here is so important. how much financial asphyxiation.

Did you understand? Asphyxia financial, although relevant, is not In my understanding, it is so relevant. as for the connection map that he opened. Why? Because these same businesspeople, these same groups have operations in other locations, did you understand? If you didn't understand, you'll understand soon enough. What else? Supreme Court of the United States

Unidos gives victory to the Trump administration on Voting by mail. You'll have to Vote traceability. Finally, it's a a decision that has a temporary effect, but what is important, including being a reinforcement for the project that Trump put forward. to vote in the United States for to guarantee the elections and eliminate some

of the vulnerabilities that they They found it there recently. Great goal! We were expecting this. And here I am I have to raise an important point. about my work and my readings. I was telling you that if I if it was correct there in 23, that in the year from 2024 onwards, censorship was applied in Brazil.

which had American companies that can to be punished for promoting censorship abroad from the United States, the censorship applied in Brazil with government participation Democrat of the United States, who followed more or less the pattern that was that was applied in the United States, that if I if that investigation was correct, It started there in the United States about the

The pandemic issue would unfold into the political issues and what would be more It's cheap for them to demonstrate that. operating in Brazil requires demonstrating in United States and that they would do this in the year 2024. Why? That there would be an election. in the United States. It would be very difficult.

from the same big tech companies, the same companies and the same political agents maintain the same practice in the United States when were in the process of being exposed by These practices in Brazil, which would make Brazil is a fundamental element in American elections. Several of my friends who live in the United States, including

They disagreed with me about that. And what We saw Twitter files in 2024, which opened Pandora's box, which I called de vasa fato. I even warned there that abuses against human rights also they would be exposed from that point on. movement and that gradually the The whole world would recognize the abuses. promoted by the Brazilian judiciary. AND

This also happened. Look, the discussion is about the risks. electoral problems stemmed from interference. electoral generated by censorship here and like a mirror investigation there in the States United. This means that both the package of Trump's measures, which will improve the The American electoral process now, as the impact of this Supreme Court decision

American courts derive from the discussion that It only existed because of the exposure of censorship in Brazil. I even anticipated that the American Big Teex companies that were partners from the censorship process, they were converted into female whistleblowers. I even anticipated it. The actions of the owner of Facebook. He then did for company today in meta the

Zukenberg, Marcos Zuckenberg, before he spoke about Trump, before what he would say about Trump, Riz Bars, He's the big shot, a Portuguese guy. less educated and that they would then cease to be investigated to become informants. This also happened. The result of all this movement in which big tech companies they began to report the abuses, to

complaining about abusers, complaining about fines and etc., that was the promotion of this discussion in the American context. AND that discussion there not only helped to Trump's election, as I said that it would happen, but it also extended to the effects that we see now. So, yes, I spoke from the political perspective in

Brazil, even politics in the States United, but I knew so much what I I was saying that all the consequences that I anticipated, if I If it were correct, it would have happened. Who thinks independence is written? or death on the Brazilian flag isn't there Qualified to talk about nothing, right? But That's not my case.

What else? Trump calls Carne and Ford Ontario, of clowns who need to enter On the line. Canada says no to the United States. United, and the consequences go far beyond... from its borders. In economic terms Against Canada, Trump enters another A difficult war to win. And in small state, Premier John Ontario says that

Canada should cut supply of electricity and minerals critical to United States. Well, I've already commented on that. with you. The media every time the Trump has a clash, he says he will. lose. What we've seen, he has having won all the battles, thus as they said Milei would lose the midterms and he won the midter terms and

That's how it's been. So here we are again The media does the obvious: lies, distorts, and says... He's going to lose again, but he won't. Canada is much more dependent, much more. of the United States than the United States United they suffer, because it doesn't depend on them, Canada's impact. Canada is a state that without help from

It barely holds up outside. This is the reality. The Chinese Communist Party It has no means to maintain Canada, as they are trying to make it seem that it has, especially in the current situation of distancing the Chinese in relation to the West. Therefore, in practice, The trend is that not only Canada will not

manage to maintain that position and it won't even as he becomes more exposed, because if you're not going to supply the States United, who will it supply? to the Party Chinese Communist. That's the point. Then, Contrary to what one might imagine, Trump There's no way to win, no. A lot of On the contrary, he has all the prospects.

Of the possible victories in this case, all are included. This move by Canada comes as a a way to generate a reference for other economic colonies of China in region, an attempt at resistance. But the big problem is that these... Resistance movement would only do It would make sense or have no effect if the Party

Chinese Communist had means to to support or supplant their colonies economic. It does not have. And that's it. European Union releases another R6 billion of Brazilian reais in military aid for Ukraine. Ukraine welcomes European allies in time of intensified attacks Russians. We already knew this would happen. It's progressing as we expected. Why

Yes, I comment on Ukraine and I'm writing about... Ukraine, I'm sure of it. What would the terms of the agreement be beforehand? Why do they appear? And they appeared. I figured out what the States' position would be. United regarding the agreement, and she too. he came.

What else? I've already booked it. what else I've already marked your comment. Every time you you have the opportunity to make a snide remark, You're coming. Let's see him there. I'll mention Now, but I've already booked it. In a little while I'll comment while reading the chat. You who If you're around, you'll see my reply.

about the debate. I've already booked it, okay? Okay Booked already. Very good. But going back Here, then, look, we already knew what the path would be in Ukraine, how would there be an intensification in local combat, the expansion of risk International, how the exhibition would even work and not inclusive and not only

regional, how would Europe try to maintain a conflict. Look, at the moment when the They are accused of corruption, the Europeans are trying to maintain a conflict, in that he acknowledges that if war to end, he leaves the presidency, they They are trying to maintain the conflict. That's exactly right. That's the case, exactly as I

I anticipated that it would be an intensification of local conflict, the erosion of support social in Europe the extent of the conflict which also happened, such as the risk of The expansion of the war would go against the grain of that's what they were expecting. This also happened. And so it goes. We're moving towards an agreement there, and they're acting like...

Everything to prevent that from happening, right? And that's it. Let's do a general reading. Short, Share, monetize. Diogo. @gmail.com It's the Pix key. It is also the key to PayPal. In a Pix or a PayPal, you monetize my work and value and values ours, me, ours Space, right? I can only remain Here because you not only stay here,

how does it continue to monetize my work. Game. @gmail.com. Short, Share and monetize with absolutely any amount. Me and all of us who We are here, we are counting on you. Give it this strength, Give me that support. Like, share, monetize. Let me refill my water. That's almost 100 here. It went well.

Just a little bit. I forgot about her today. He was It was too rushed, too demanding for me. Let me ask you here, folks, just one thing. minute.

While you're clicking "like," check... Your registration and they monetize any value. Let's have a good chat today.

the. First, let's go. Comments of this nature will... Find it around. So, before I to open the general section, I'm not even going to wait for the Reading the chat. I don't know if it will be there. I'll answer right now. You are blind. Look at the comments on the citizen's social media.

common: "Wait, but wasn't the network a bubble and "Wasn't that a reference?" I didn't understand. He left. of being a bubble. You chose the concept. It's either a bubble or a benchmark. Well, for I am a reference. See the comments on the networks of the average citizen. How is that Can you identify who the average citizen is?

Who doesn't have a communication profile? Well, I follow very carefully the ordinary citizen. Not attending the debate is a total disrespect, but That's not what I've seen. Perhaps That being your opinion, the opinion The majority opinion is that he did very well and not go. Even in individuals who are Critics, the commentary of the average citizen.

That being said, Flávio 22, very well, Flávio, you did well not to go. And for Here it goes. Proof that this is yours I wish, not reality, that... The audience for the debate was pitiful. ridiculous. People didn't even see it so they could... to be outraged. There isn't the average citizen who found one.

It's disrespectful not to attend the debate. That's not it. It existed. Whoever found that disrespectful to the debate is... someone who respects nothing. The voters of Adolfinho, did you understand? Perhaps they don't know how to differentiate a payment slip. from one of a tax guides. put in hand In front of you, you don't know what's what. Who

He got angry, maybe the fellow party members of Cassabe, the mass Look, I'll tell you, today I... I even asked on the street. about the debate. What I heard most was What debate? What I heard most often when I asked, I I circulated quite a bit today, it was a debate. Was there a debate?

Anyway.

Like, share, monetize. Come on, everyone. So, there was a little time. For you to monetize, see if anyone Remember that I exist. What else? Let's go. It would be disrespectful not to go. No no and. That's not true. Disrespect is putting a a bunch of irrelevant people who have nothing I vote nowhere to debate with

who really has the vote, with the only the objective of wearing down whoever can win the Squid. This is disrespectful of Lula. Already Anything is expected. Perfect. Who is it? What matters is who's in power and how it ends. with the lives of Brazilians. Now think about the prisoners of January 8th. who were counting on Flavio for

defend them. Defend them from whom? dear? From Caiado. Defend them from whom? From Renanzinho. Defend them from whom? How should we approach this debate? As target, the only target of all those who were There, without Lula's presence, he would defend... who? Than? What are you talking about?

And what I wanted happened. He proved that these guys don't have the vote. He proved that these guys don't have the vote. No There was no one there to watch. Where are the voters of this group to see the What are their proposals? Where? But it's not a proposal. Where is it? Was it? It wasn't. That's right, isn't it? That's something.

Flávio's obligation is to present He made the proposal and he has been doing it. You want See Flavio's proposals? Go there His network is all good there. Reviewing criticism and taking hits is part of the process. Put That's what he's going to say in the hearing of the... Jornal Nacional, which is a press office of

The press of the Lula regime. Courage is not lacking. What's the problem? There is absolutely no obligation to debate. to serve as a stepping stone for irrelevant people to wear themselves out with the sole purpose Strengthen Lula. Keep dreaming. Anyway, What I wanted happened. We proved that Without Flávio, there's no audience. Simple as that.

Anyone who wants to know the proposals of Flávio, what he does most is talk about proposal. Congratulations, Flávio! Each Better day.

Getting better every day. Well, with that said, let's go. There, folks. I want to talk to you. today about the brutal difference between the competence and subservience. And here I am I have a little context. basic things to do before opening what I have something to say about the work of independent journalists, analysts

independent, is one of those who accumulate Both roles are journalists. analysts, etc. Well, that's a preamble. basic just so we can talk about in a balanced way. Thank you very much. Oh, sorry everyone, I... I came in with a It's incredibly hectic here, even though I have Arrived late, huh? Believe me, I got in.

As fast as I could, right? Things They're doing well. Racing, I believe that Starting next week, we should, God willing, right? Stay a little while more stable. It's necessary, right? It is difficult. Without stability, it's difficult to maintain... Things are working. So it is. He's the only one making an offer. Flavio. The rest is just to pay for

pirate. Okay, so let's go. Look, Let's just set the scene for what I have to offer. to say today. It's very important, it has the see what Minister Alexandre said de Moraes and with the main events of the day, which confirm various readings that you have accompanied here, which is a sign of

We are on the right track. Then, I think you'll be happy with the that we have to talk about here Today, okay? I am convinced that you They will be very happy with what... We have people to talk to. Honestly, you're going to like it. quite that's what we have to talk about here today.

Just a minute, everyone. There's always something missing. right? There's always one. Oh my God. It does not have problem. For everything in this life there is a C. I I'll figure something out. I always find a way. I I always find a way around it, there's no way around it. That's a problem, isn't it?

Everything's alright, look. Let's begin then.

Yeah, this whole debate thing hit home, didn't it? I I said: "If Flávio doesn't go to the debate, This will prove that Lula has no audience. I want to see why Lula doesn't Go. Lula is leaving. Debate is irrelevant. This is a trap. Let me tell you something something in a very clear way for the person

who still doesn't understand. I'll even take it from Come back here, okay? Let's go. Do you know what it is? Disrespectful, Keller? Yes, it's about dealing with Lula. on an equal footing. You cannot exchange proposals with the individual who governed the country when 1 trillion was stolen by the responsible person, because the ruler

responsible because of the 1 trillion dollar hole in the country, cannot be treated equally to like someone who has the best proposals, because then you cancel them out. You tell the audience that everything is fine, You erase the guy's history, don't you? Do it. You cannot debate. proposals on an equal footing with

Renan Santos from MBL, who is the irrelevant, who exchanges ideas like a teenage girl changes her underwear, halfway or in a dress, that each hour says something different, inconsistently, above all, Because that's how you deliver relevance. Seriousness is bestowed upon those who lack it. This is disrespectful to the viewers. including treating legitimately those

It lacks legitimacy. for a variety of reasons. The dispute between Lula and anyone else It's not a competition of proposals, it's a dispute between the person responsible for structuring the biggest scandals of corruption in Brazilian history. THE Mensalão, which is a dictatorship of bribery. to buy the votes of Brazilians with money embezzled from the people themselves

Brazilian. That was the real deal. Dictatorship of bribery. Petrolão. Dictatorship of bribery 2.0. Now there's retirement and so on. It's not possible to treat them the same way. You cannot legitimately treat the guy who agreed to censorship and marked the Alexandre de Moraes on social media People he wanted to censor. It does not have. You're not going to deliver that.

individual. This is disrespectful. And those who don't see that are the ones who are blind. Therefore, it's only worth it. run the risk of bringing something legitimacy for those who have none, when you have the opportunity to Who are we really facing? It attacks the country. And that's what Flavio he said. If Lula goes, I'll go, because then

it is worth it. Despite running the risk of take people to watch these irrelevant, despite the attacks and setbacks in Research is worthwhile because you could show in the same debate how the The focus of the irrelevant is to protect Lula. You could expose Lula's wounds. that nobody talks about, like his son's.

that's what I said. That's worth it. Now, without Lula, go there, just to give to the irrelevant ones, the opportunity to contribute to research a wear and tear that doesn't translate to the world Real, just like the one you tried to fabricate. here. No, That would be disrespectful to the prisoners. politicians, to his father, to each of us

and to the country. When it didn't happen, it proved that Lula didn't... There's nobody here. He showed the obvious. that these mousetraps, that do not They don't want to debate anything, they just want to to harm those who are truly in the up front, we know very well who it is. winner, They will not be created with a candidate for

mature presidency, coherent and intelligent, which has proven to be the Flávio Bolsonaro. Simple as that. Well, with that said, let's finally get to it. people. Let's go. Are you ready? Press the Seatbelt up, what time is it now? There's still time, It's not that late. Let's go.

Fasten your seatbelt there. Well, we're back to... prize. I'm not going to cut it anymore, okay? Let's go, quick. Focus on me here. Let's go. Look, So, in the old days the incompetence or subservience of The media was less visible. People could barely see some to others. Back then, in the past, we didn't even have much of a vision of

what the political system was actually like Brazilian. So, the chiefs chose One or two medallions. What are the medallions? Those politicians most famous to give an air of Representation for the masses. So, one or two more well-known ones that They cast many votes. And then using the electoral machine in a people that

I chose him just because, because the guy is... funny. It can't get any worse than this, vote. Tiririca and I voted for that guy. Or because Okay, based on absolutely nothing, Brazilian disconnected, apoliticized by complete, it maintained entire benches at service of political parties. And the press is complicit with the parties. politicians and the processes of power

I kept it invisible. And that The subservience of the press was not... noticeable. People only had access to information that they wanted they had, including to understand the news that they published. But all of that was before the internet. The internet emerged and broke the monopoly. of the information. I'm not just talking about

It's not just that, the news. From the information as a whole. So, digital courses, even these perhaps a little more charlatans, selling the obvious, as if It was an incredible thing, but it's not. problem. But for some people the Obviously, it really was amazing. They don't They had access to it. People They gained access to the opinion of one of the

others. without depending on the press anymore. You no longer depend on Globo or... Uncensored media to find out what the other person thinks. It broke the dynamic. It became easy for you to know what the social consensus is. With That's when you start to confront what you know being the social consensus with the

which the media says is the social consensus. And that's when she starts to lose credibility. with the financial and economic crises, caused by the PT administrations and company. And the attempt at defense that the The media also worked against this and took it away. her credibility, because her the feeling of impoverishment is no longer a thing.

feeling when you saw the other complaining about the same impoverishment. I I'll never forget the Bolso effect. stomach during the PT administration, in which The father of memes circulated via email. THE People received the memes via email. It circulated, or rather, on Orcut, it circulated a lot. (Photo: Facebook, Orcut, transition era) still from a plate of rice

with ketchup and a piece of leaf notebook with a chicken leg drawn on it

Because it wasn't possible to buy protein. or a photo of the refrigerator door with the Eggs on the door. Each egg had written on it... a cut of meat such as sirloin, rump, rump steak in an egg, because there wasn't enough Buy more protein. This broke That talk today about inflation hitting... 0.37%.

This discredited the media and discredited the political system a supporter who upheld this. That's why that the street demonstrations were shouting is without a party and the toucans, who would be They were not eligible for the left-wing alternative.

That's why people were cursing Globo. Trash, down with Rede Globo, as a symbol. that the lies no longer worked. AND Look, at that time we didn't have the Internet exponents still. Therefore, contrary to what the minister did That's something I don't have today, it's not the result of the leading figures on the internet. You

Internet exponents are the result of The end of the credibility of the lying media. and manipulative. The media is dead, the old Media died before the internet won. body,

did you understand? before, long before, it was precisely the vacuum of credibility created by the media liar, who opened space for The emergence of digital media, why not? There is a power vacuum. So it's the other way around. First, the mismedia loses credibility. then new sources of information come along to gradually occupy that space. THE

The phenomenon is something else entirely. And this is an analysis, Father, for free. Said That's right, both the old political system and It handed power over to the chieftains. Regarding the media that protected this model, They both collapsed. Both. And this process only expanded. Before, when they came with a... a serious lie about a violation of

According to the law or the Constitution, Brazilians do not I understood this and there was no one who explained. with the internet, already with the internet exponents and with the reference brutal that Jair Bolsonaro brought politicizing the humblest citizen, more Simple, inviting the average Brazilian. For political debate, we started reading the text of the Constitution, of the law

and we started to confront things Does that mean that now those abuses that where the Supreme Court legislated and nobody He said nothing had changed. And here I go to bring the first concrete reference about that. Look, Look at this. Wait a minute. Hey, Did I not bring the image? He brought. Look, take a look at this. And me

I have the video of the minister speaking to People talk. Oops, sorry. I have the video of the minister speaking to us to talk. Alexandre de Moraes says that The Brazilian electoral model has failed. Ah, No, not that one yet, no. Forgive me, To really confuse things. Wait a minute, I will demonstrate it concretely.

It was very successful. No, that's coming soon. social. Pay attention to this. The minister Alexandre Moraes will talk about Aias. Bodies. And I'm going to explain something to you. that between 2000, I'll state this beforehand, between 2015 and 2019, the custody hearing was completely unconstitutional and was the result of a violation of multiple violations

direct constitutional amendments promoted by Brazilian judiciary with impunity. They violated the separation of powers. harmony, independence among powers. They violated the first article in that all the power of the people violated Article 22 of the Constitution which establishes the power to legislate to legislative. Anyway, but I'll explain point by point. point. First, let's listen to the speech here.

from him. Custódio is the abas corpus social eh do abas corpus inglês, né? body tabs is Bringing the body, is at the beginning of the law, bring the body before the judge, take it and the The judge is analyzing. Now, if that's the case, at least for a large portion of society has been bringing problems, the

The judiciary needs to rethink, not the... extinction of the custody hearing, but a regulation. What are the hypotheses that he remains imprisoned, until... because the custody hearing was created to verify the absence of abuse in prison. And these are just a few others. It's not possible. more than in some states, the crime of

murder prescribe 20 years. 20 years. That's because the The receipt of the complaint interrupts the pronunciation interrupts, The judiciary has to see why. So, institutional strengthening It goes through all three branches of government. The power Judiciary, you can be sure, not only Before, right? And that's also happening. gradually done now in presidency of Minister Faquim, also

This is being done through the CNJ, which is a a very important tool for this, It's about moving forward. in guaranteeing institutional security, of legal certainty and security public as well. So, look at this, here's the minister. He defended the custody hearing. He He said he came to make sure. Okay, let's go.

to the facts. The custody hearing was created by Brazilian judiciary in 2015 compliance with the San Rossé Pact Costa Rica, the same one that was ignored. to remove the voting rights of Jair Bolsonaro and also when they ignored the presumption of innocence and individualization of responsibility criminal. Two parameters that exist in Brazilian Constitution, but they are also

foreseen in the Pact of San Rossé da Costa Rich. Remember that this is also why Pact of San Rossé of Costa Rica, the President Bolsonaro could not be declared ineligible without a conviction criminal, but they had already done that. before criminal conviction. It seems then that the international agreement, the The Pact of San José, Costa Rica, is only

Remembered when it suits him. No good Portuguese, the Pact of San José da Costa Rica, like so many other agreements international, it has the validity of an article constitutional when approved in Brazilian Congress. This happened. But What did this pact say? from San Rossé, Costa Rica, where This decision stemmed from the judiciary in

practical, right, of of include the audience custody. Good, Father São Costa Rica said that the prisoner The most important thing should be presented to the judge. as soon as possible, without establishing necessarily a deadline. Perfect. The American Convention of Human Rights, in practice, meant by Parque São C da Costa Rica, which all

A detained person must be escorted without delay in the presence of a judge. This is the In this context, it must be carried out without delay. Well, if this were an article constitutional, be conducted without delay, you see, he doesn't It establishes the deadline, the form, and the means. It means that in order to simply comply with

with that determination, we would have two paths. The legislature legislates on that and creates all the parameters, which is who has the power to do it, or simply The individual appears before the judge. That's what was there. In 2015, the judiciary began to regulate the procedure. First The big problem is that the judiciary only has...

regulatory power over matters administrative. And I'm not the one saying that. I, it is the text of the Constitution itself and It is the text of the law itself. The judiciary Yes, it does have the autonomy to regulate the own administrative matters judiciary, such as its regulations internal affairs, etc. But when we talk about

criminal procedure, that's where we talk about the CPP, the Code of Criminal Procedure. And in that case, only who can legislate in the CPP is the legislator, therefore Congress National. Violating the prerogatives of the very judiciary, the judiciary legislated as if one could change the CPP. And that was it. questioned in 2015, when he started

to regulate the procedure. The Court of Justice of São Paulo issued the joint provision. number three. This was questioned in the Supreme Federal Court. exactly on the argument that if I was creating a procedural procedure. criminal law without federal law, matter of legislative competence of the Union. Although the text of the Constitution is

very clear about that competence to legislate and more than That is, while the person himself criminal procedural law itself leaves clearly stated in article 22, paragraph 1, is explicitly, it is the exclusive responsibility of Union to legislate on Criminal Law and criminal procedure, despite the clarity solar interpretation of the constitutional text in the ADI (Direct Action of Unconstitutionality).

5200 0, the Supreme Court, contradicting the text Based on the Constitution and the law, it was decided that the The judiciary could indeed regulate, and that... That was worth it. And he knows that's why. Was it possible? Without anyone Did you question it? Because in 2015 the only media available she was a worshipper of power, a

subservient. The competent one did not exist. still to clarify for the citizen. And this news passed by as just another one. in Brazilian society. with the columnists from Estadão, Folha and Company, giving validity to this legal atrocity. Among so many other problems that the Brazilians were already living through the economic crisis. Dilma, including this act, passed

beaten. But the serious issue here is that the judiciary legislated all the votes in the country and the parameters constitutional. If there were competent media and not Only the subservient one, everyone knew. from that. Perhaps that's why they hate it so much. competent media. From then on, everything remained the same. unconstitutional. On August 20th

In 2015, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) validated the invalidable. and rejected ADI 5240. Then, on September 9, 2015, the DPF 347, shortly thereafter, the Supreme Federal Court determined that judges and courts implemented custody hearings, allowing presentation of the prisoner to the authorities judicial within 24 hours. And then they They established all the parameters.

Now, if the covenant says that every person detained or held person must be escorted without The presence of a judge may take time, but not It establishes nothing. This means that the pact did not establish None of the parameters. And look, not even the president by decree. I could create those parameters, because

They don't exist in law. Decree The president can only regulate what It exists in law, he understands? So, there was no federal law, No one has legislated on this, as is required. the Constitution, as required by law itself criminal procedural law in article 22, Paragraph 1. And even so, the judiciary set a 24-hour deadline, which is not

no treaty, nor any law, realization of a specific procedural hearing, mandatory presence of the Ministry Public attendance is mandatory. Public Defender's Office Attorney, questions that the judge should ask, method of recording the hearing, procedure for investigating torture, automatic application of certain Types of imprisonment and consequences procedural grounds for non-compliance. And only those

Could I do that? Law. Between 2015 and 2019, the audiences of custody in practice they carried out the direct violation. of all legislative power and of all Brazil's votes. Only in 2019, with Moro's anti-crime package, That's when the regulation finally arrives. In other words, CNJ Resolution 213 of 2015, the CNJ that he said was so

important for regulation, when he legislated, regulated, It served to violate democracy, didn't it? to protect her. And it's not that journalist who is speaking. I'm reading the terms here. specific laws. That's why I can comment on it. Everything, I bring the factual basis for. I'm not the one questioning here, it's the the text of the law, the text of the Constitution and

their decisions. Simple as that. And there's more. The Covenant of Saint Joseph itself Costa Rica's article 2 makes it clear, quotation marks, according to their standards constitutional, legislative measures or of another nature (close quotation marks). Or In other words, the crucial point here is according to their constitutional norms. And what establishes the constitutional norm

Brazilian? In article 84, paragraph 4, It allows the president to issue decrees. regulations for its faithful execution, but it needs to enforce laws existing. In other words, no president He could do that by decree. only those The National Congress could do this. until 2019, when the package is approved. anti-crime, which is then included in the Code

Criminal Procedure, in the CPP, includes in article 310 of the CPP, the custody hearing. Until there, all hearing decisions of The custody proceedings were illegal. All. And all those who practiced hearing of custody violated the Constitution frontally. Including the Supreme Court that validated this, and whoever points out this violation... of the Constitution and the powers

It is the Supreme Court's own decision. All of Power emanates from the people through their elected representatives. It wasn't like that anymore in 2015. But without the Without the right people on the internet, you won't... via this. Without the annoying questions. Well, how Did you validate it if there was no law? Like this? How does the judiciary

created rules of the Code of Criminal Procedure that only were included in the Code of Criminal Procedure Four years later? How did they do that? Without The validation of no votes. All the power It did not emanate from the people, it emanated from the non- elected. And now these questions annoying, professional journalists who swallow

They won't do letter D. The columnist analysts of Folha Estadão They will not do it, as they did not do it, for 4 years of sepulchral silence of all jurists, specialists, certified analysts and journalists from country.

No one would question the minister of The Supreme Court is defending this now. From 2019 onwards, it has gained support. legal. But what about previous decisions? How many criminals left at the hearing? Custody? How many? How many cases like this one, involving this young man, will we see now? of the devil, I don't know what to call it,

who kept his ex-wife tied up with a a chain around her neck attached to her feet and that if she stretched her legs, I would hang him. When the police enter, the The woman's legs were trembling wildly, because she couldn't stretch them with his mouth and nose burned by substance he used to make her fall asleep

and tie her up in chains. The subject When arrested, he said that as soon as he got out I would kill her. And at the custody hearing, the judge released him. How many criminals of this nature were there? released between 2015 and 2019 against the Brazilian Constitution? Who pays for this? price? How many lives were lost?

Were they innocent during those 4 years? Who Pay this bill? Why didn't anyone ask these questions? That's why the press doesn't have credibility, Minister Moraes.

That's why I brought here a concrete case of Today's speeches, too. That's why they turn out to be a nuisance to the audience. negative. Domingo Espetacular loses audience and has second worst performance of the year with the Lula's interview, what's on the agenda? in election polls. 21% less audience than in recent years.

four Sundays. He finished in third place in a way uninterrupted throughout its entirety exhibition. It seems that Lula's votes are just empty promises. Not only do they not buy anything, they don't go out on the streets, They also don't watch him on TV. He is the acting president. he understands? What's going on here?

In Portuguese? That's clear, but there's more. Xand Moraes says that the electoral model Brazilian man went bankrupt and advocates migration to mixed-member proportional representation system. So let's see the He talks about it. This model electoral failed because it produces, it produces candidates and elected officials who do not have no affiliation with any political parties

and who are much more concerned with staying Doing a live stream from the Chamber instead of discussing it. It's the project that's being approved. Weaken Congress here. again. Candidates and elected officials who do not have No affiliation with any political parties. This model is bankrupt because it has candidates and elected officials who do not have

No affiliation with any political parties. What does this mean? That before The elected officials depended on the internet. parties, those elected were tied to political parties. And this is the country where the people went to streets, minister, to say it's without party, because parties don't They represented the masses. It was the absence of

representativeness of the parties that made them unrepresentative. The internet, therefore, provided an answer. opening up the possibility for those who do not are linked to the parties, which do not They represent no one, they represent the mass. When I said that the district vote and Whether purely district-based or mixed, Brazil does not

I was prepared, what I told you you? If we were to cast the vote pure or even mixed district system in Brazil From today onwards, we would strengthen the parties. politicians. Yes or no?

That's exactly what I said. Look, the The problem with this, folks, is that you're going to... If you pass, you will prioritize the vote of machine. If you implement district voting now, Do you remember that? If you implement district voting Now, you're going to resurrect the system. A party member who is bankrupt.

Because the guy who's already on the machine, the cow on a post, that guy who says: "Wow, how did that cow end up there?" "On the post?" The cow on the post, She already has access to public money. which is not hers, to hand over modifications in the district. The parties will put more cows in

Post, and nothing less. Because the individual who has a speech that pleases the masses doesn't necessarily mean... this one has all the necessary votes in same district. Therefore, the district vote will strengthen the parties and weaken the society. And what is he doing? Complaining here? Without the vote district parties are weakened. He wants to strengthen the parties. He

He's using my argument. candidates and elected officials who do not have no affiliation with any political parties, Yes, they are much more concerned with staying Doing a live stream from the Chamber instead of discussing it. It's the project that's being approved. that weaken Congress. And here, just the fact of addressing this topic already...

It violates the Constitution again, because Supreme Court justices should not argue political structures. Who has ideas? about political structures that candidate and go discuss it in the correct arena. political trickery in the practice of its powers. Yes or no?

If the internet's work was so bad Therefore, if he were not competent, he would not be there. in the arguments of those who criticize Internet work, I think. Finally, I say, this is the last video. His, okay? Listen to this. Today an influencer that nobody ever You've heard about it here. Well, people have absolutely no idea...

What are you talking about? Talk about the war of Ukraine and even the lamented defeat of Corinthians through Curitiba yesterday. He knows how to comment on everything. Good, Let's take it one step at a time, because this is... important. First, you have to let It's very clear what an influencer is. The term influencer comes to refer to people in

digital media that influence the lives of other people with their own daily life. That's where the term came from. influencer. These are people who posted the their lives, their routines, and with that They influenced other people. this The term "influencer" is used to describe this. Then the term expanded a little more. with the people who started bringing eh

discussing ways of living, eh courses on understanding life, etc. AND to start influencing people, by example, influencer is for eh eh financial education, influencer about philosophy, influencer. So, people They address these issues and influence others. people. Fashion influencer, clothing influencer. Hence the term influencer, from influencing. based on that. A reportage job journalistic,

a report job eh eh of Political and geopolitical analysis is not a Influencer job. Then he can be political analyst, geopolitical analyst or when it combines functions journalist. What establishes this? THE activity practiced. So, first, The influencer doesn't talk about Ukraine, unless... that he is Ukrainian and is reporting on his life there. If it is not

That's the case, the term influencer doesn't apply. It fits. The glossary needs updating. But That being said, Let's talk about everything, let's talk about Ukraine. Well, I can't speak for Others, but I can speak for myself. I am journalist with formal registration in Ministry of Economy, as established by law. And not here, it's not because the

The Supreme Court allowed not having a degree, that's it. because there is no law in Brazil. that requires a diploma. I've already said this. many times, and I'll repeat it. There is no no current legislation that requires the A degree is required to become a journalist in Brazil. AND There has never been a single moment in history.

in Brazil where there was the only moment in history when there was Diploma requirement for the activity. The journalistic decision was arbitrary. based on AI5 and AI16, adopted from top down, without anyone's vote. elected during the military regime. to to have control over who could exercise the activity. Then, the Constitution The Brazilian woman was unable to receive this.

legislation. This was only discussed in 2009, which is a serious act, but it couldn't be done. to receive this legislation. Why? Why The 1988 Constitution states that whoever According to the law, all power emanates from the people. Who The legislature legislates. And like no one from The legislature validated that legislation. to welcome it in light of the Constitution of

88 would be a violation of the first article, the article 2 directly, That would violate Article 5 and the protections. which he brings and also article 220. By For this reason, the 1988 Constitution does not was able to receive, to welcome that legislation and no other was created by the legislature, which is the only body that could

eh versar, conforme o artigo 5º, inciso oavº, who can regulate professions only by power of law. According to clause According to article 5, nobody is obliged to do or not to do something except in by virtue of law. Therefore, it couldn't be. Having said that about the graduates, let's move on to... This point here. Today I revoked

formally designating Syria as State sponsor of terrorism. That action unlocks new potential for economic revitalization and progress of Syria. The Trump administration continues to to advance the national security of the States United to achieve peace, prosperity and security in the Middle East. On October 7, 2023, I said that the attack against Israel was authorized

through the Sino-globalist axis, the globalists Europeans and the Chinese Communist Party, that these attacks would not be possible without the participation of Assad, who He was in charge of Syria at the time, and that... It would be an act of betrayal against Putin. created a problem for him, which if I If he were correct, Assad would fall.

of the management of Syria with a movement that would probably come from northeastern Syria and that the Russians They would appear to be fighting this movement. but that this movement would win, would overthrow Assad and then take over power in Syria would continue. peacefully integrated with Russia that He fought them. I also said that the new Syria is

would integrate with the West and that was essential for reorganization economic center of the Middle East, which most It would later isolate Iran, exposing its 50 Iranian tones, which also happened, that the If Syria were to become a negotiable zone, but that would be hard work, it would take time, but that the administration would have this proposal of

integrate with everyone and that the next step would be to reconstruction from Syria, the economic revitalization of Syria as a free trade zone In all directions.

It is now August 24, 2026. almost 3 years later, we read in Secretary Marco's statement Rubio, after Assad fell, after him being welcomed by the Russian government and now eating with a straw, then the revolutionaries that They were overthrown after being fought by the Russians. to maintain the Russian bases, after the revolutionary who seized power from

site, to align with the United States after to integrate the containment force of Iranian Revolutionary Guard in Syrian territory. Now comes the suspension of sanctions in in relation to Syria and revitalization economic, as I mentioned earlier. This is not the job of an influencer. This is serious political analysis. Understanding the interests involved.

of the real intentions of the actions adopted and where things would go. Something that an influencer I wouldn't be able to do it. Something that the media subservient, Besides not being able to understand, even if it were so, I wouldn't do it, as still It doesn't work that way, selling successive defeats. from the United States that never arrive.

They do marketing, not analysis. propaganda, not journalism. That's why competent media is a nuisance. both. I can't speak for everyone, as in In all areas, you have good and bad. professionals, but I can speak for them. me.

Supreme Court Justice Flávio Dino stated this Monday, the 24th, the amendments Parliamentarians are today the biggest driver of corruption. When we are called upon to speak of crime, says Dino, state and market, if we only look at for the bureaucratic state establishment, I don't see a greater vector of corruption today. except for parliamentary amendments. It's something

which goes through the three instances federative and travels, in a certain In this sense, the three branches of government and the legal profession. Deciding. In July 2023. I warned about how Lula's government paid the amendments to billions only to then get rid of center. At the end of 2023, I warned that if

Flávio Dino went to the Supreme Court Federal, he would be the figure to investigate. top-down amendments.

How would he connect the capillaries? of the investigations against the amendments to Political bosses? that if it were Correct, in the first quarter of In 2024, there would be a boom in investigations. of the municipalities, initially with the regional businessmen, then consequently they are always the same with local governments, city halls, councilors, parties and through them

with the parliamentary amendments. I even warned about how the Supreme Court had transferred the rapporteur's amendments, the budget secret for committee and amendments ministry. precisely to make it easier criminalization of party leaders And that Dino would be the figure to do it. I based my statement on the 23rd as well. Lula said that organized crime was in

press, in the judiciary And in politics, who were the men? white people in agriculture who do not represent the people. And more than that, I demonstrated how they prepared to get rid of Minister Alexandre de Moraes and I even highlighted the articles here from Thaí Oiama. still in that year with Maerovit is already making pointed criticisms.

decisions that they had already characterized as abusive actions by Minister Alexandre de Moraes with sparse markings that would serve later to stitch the position consistent with dismedia and how from from the end of 24 the editorials the newspapers They would begin to distance themselves from the newsrooms. condemning human rights violations promoted by the Supreme Court and the interpelées

economics, economic mistakes practices carried out by Lula's regime. And that It also happened. This confirms it. exactly the plan of the amendment that I I've been announcing this for so long. Point by point. Regarding the Banco Master case, I warned about how it worked. the way, including to remove from tucanocentrism the two ministers

Supreme Court justices closest to them, Gilmar Mendes and Alexandre de Moraes. This is not the job of an influencer. Look, I've already gotten the Syria thing right, I already... I was right about Ukraine, I was right about Israel, I was right about the United States. I was right about the censorship and I was right about

the investigation of the amendments, regarding the Dino's appointment, regarding the siege against the Supreme Court justices, promoted by The very regime that pretends to be on their side. I just didn't talk about the Corinthians game. because it had no political implications. So maybe I would speak up too. This is serious political analysis.

The more people having access to each other's opinions, the more access they have to references to the information base, to The letter of the law, the letter of the Constitution, the more well-founded questions things that are bothersome are brought into the debate or explanations that provide clarity for what it happens, less credibility already

Discredited, subservient press. That is to say, the more subservient the The press is, But it strengthens those who speak the truth.

That's the point. So, there are definitely people in the middle. digital tools that do a poor job. Yes, but the people who do one Bad work doesn't prosper. It doesn't have a larger audience than the newspaper. National, as he concludes in his speech. Do you want to see the conclusion of the speech?

from him? THE, See the conclusion. Influencers have a larger audience. more influential than Jornal Nacional, than all the television news programs combined. Here he is acknowledging what I'm saying. It's been quite a while. In the old days, supported the idea of 30 40 30 saying that 40% the population was always informed on Rede Globo. Here he is.

acknowledging that this is not true. If Nobody gets their information from... journalist, if the digital journalist has more viewers than all the news programs combined added together, so how, if that is the case, So how does Flávio have 40% of the votes? only? This was worked on. This was worked on. to discredit.

No, the one who worked to discredit That's when they lied about the crisis. economic situation during Dilma's government, when they hid the violations from the masses of the Constitution while the judiciary legislated. What contributed to the loss of credibility of The media still lies about it today. inflation. It's just a feeling. lying about what people think

daylight, against what they live and feel firsthand. every day. Those who are working to destroy the media are the The media itself has stopped caring. in a seemingly legitimate way. It lost credibility when the journalists from major media outlets They recount the exchange of messages with laughter. with Supreme Court justices during a

live broadcast. When a journalism graduate says that "Independence or Death" is written on the flag. from Brazil, when they treat part of the population as coup plotter, when there wasn't even an investigation coup.

That's the point. How many people do you know who don't Do they believe more in traditional life? All people who have a drop of conscience, that has a functioning brain minimally good. Why? Because reality contradicts them. Everyone says, as several of the examples that I mentioned here today, for example, several and they follow it as if it were a religion.

fanatic. Everything that the bubble presents as news. But if the majority are not in the media television, Most of it is on the internet, so the Television is the bubble, Minister, the The concept of a bubble is that it's smaller. So the Today's bubble is TV, the internet is... majority and not a bubble.

Bringing it up as news. For example, I I brought here as news that in 20159 custody hearing was unconstitutional with a decision of Supreme Court giving constitutionality to something which the Constitution itself does not provide. And me I brought the articles of law that show that. I brought up the fact. What is it worth? the

a fact written in the text of the Constitution, the fact written in the text of the law or the opinion of the ministers at the time contrary to the legal fact or the subservience of the media at the time contrary to the legal fact. I picked one historical fact, but we could take the

contemporary. That's why nobody believes anymore. Those who follow fanatically are the ones who ignore. public facts. the text of the law, the interference from US AID, for example, violation of human rights to defend these positions. That's it fanaticism. Like the Brazilian media today, the press ignores the diaries of Anthony Faust solemnly. This is journalism, so it doesn't have...

credibility. Brainwashing. This is brainwashing. For example, There are media outlets that claimed that There was a shortage of vaccines during the government. Bolsonaro. Lie. Anvisa authorized One day, the next day, they were... All available. And whoever supports that is a fanatic, because is the fact recorded or is it a record? official. That's fanaticism.

He then realizes that the concept of Misinformation and fanaticism are in the media. subservient? No, not in the competent media. It's different. And who makes that comparison? It's the people. The judge of the quality of The job is to have an audience. Because in That's how democracies work. If I watch a journalist who speaks

nonsense, that recounts things that don't hold up, that has no facts, that does not survive in Time passes, and I stop watching. Simple. And that's exactly what it is. what's happening with the press. People They stopped watching because she lies. that what she says doesn't hold up in time. That's a fact. So, it's necessary to separate them properly again. I

I can't speak for others, I can Speak for me. I'm not an influencer, I don't post about it. In my life, I don't influence people to... nothing. I do journalism with facts. verifiable primary source. I make the defense of the Constitution that several of Your excellencies violate [laws] every day. based on the text of the author herself

Constitution, which is why I am candidate. I analyze the matrix of interests. global level and project scenarios integrated and I have engraved all of them with millimeter precision, which It reflects the quality of my work. So no, I'm not an influencer. I conform to the standards of the law. journalist and according to the quality of

work that presents itself over time political analyst. There are several other people on the internet. That's quality too. For those who lack quality, with time All that remains is ostracism. Simple. Simple as that. to the point that some of my arguments are included in speeches by ministers, like today, when the Minister Alexandre Moraes

demonstrated a desire for political parties. stronger and to justify this, he says that district voting would strengthen the political parties. Exactly. My argument for not approve district voting at this time, which It would strengthen the parties, it would weaken them. society. Simple as that. Like, share, monetize. Jogo.faj@gmail.com. It's the Pix key, it's also the key to

PayPal. And in a Pix or a PayPal, You can monetize my work very quickly. It ensures that we can all see each other. Again tomorrow. I talked about this again yesterday. I already I had spoken about it the day before yesterday. Yesterday I They asked, and I spoke again. It is to defend the Constitution, where

I do the job of teaching a course. about the Brazilian Constitution so that Brazilians understand, because the text The Constitution is not for lawyers, it is for the average Brazilian. It doesn't have to be lawyer, no. Every Brazilian should know their constitution as a citizen. And how As a citizen, I teach the constitution.

To Brazilians. Here's the link to the course. There are several classes there already. if Brazilians understood Constitution so clearly, both the abuse of the press and of members of the judiciary may already have That ended a long time ago.

Simple as that. The person who judges the relevance is who is watching. And my consistency specifically It's been here for years. Including Brazilian authorities, if they had me I heard, when I warned them, that they wouldn't be there. the situation they are in now. I warned you. about how throughout Latin America, all countries aligned with the Fort

São Paulo and with the PT They would all move to the right, without except, they changed, precisely Just as I said it would happen. Precisely

I warned that the partner would go bankrupt before... to inaugurate the business, which the protections of supranationals that guaranteed favorable eyes for censorship, persecution, Illegal prisons would fall, and that the moment to negotiate a strategic exit from The model was there in '23 and '24. If they had me If I had heard, they would be as they are now.

surrounded, with no options. I warned you, I I warned that the PT regime counted on the The desire of the centrist bloc to come to power and which fueled this desire for them They accepted the money, they got involved. And there's the whole lava amendment set up that They were planning to get rid of the minister.

Alexandre Mormar Mendes. There's the case of Daniel Vorcaro, for example. appeared surrounding precisely initially Minister Alexandre Moraes of Astofal and company. It wasn't for lack of warning that the The Chinese would have no means of supporting it. that the Europeans would lose the tools and they lost and that the Democrats Americans had already changed their stance.

before Trump came in, what would cause the alternations in Latin America. And I was perhaps the crazy one. that speaks from one end to the other. The fact is, as I said would happen, Soft power changed all of America. Latina. He was the first to say that. satirized in some cases, even. AND

the map turned from red to blue, Exactly as I said it would happen. in each country, for the reasons that I... I even identified Colombia. Regarding Venezuela, I warned about how the The UN was no longer the point of reference, as the The United States was building a case for Remove Maduro. This happened. As

Would it be after Maduro's removal? This considering the impact that this would have on in relation to Brazil. And there it is. I spoke about the pressure, the approach of Lula with Trump, which didn't mean... nothing. And there it is, finally, if the powerful If they had listened to me back then, I would have been free.

political prisoners to reduce violation of human rights, reported the information they had in hands on the macro structure, perhaps it wasn't in the situation where they are. But the option was always to double down. bet. If politicians had me heard, proven de facto amnesty, open impeachment request, maybe not now were being investigated for the amendments, the

If people had suffered less, Brazil's economy had less worn out, perhaps with the printed ballot. even if we weren't under pressure international and not at risk of an a somewhat more severe economic crisis that things return to their place to place. Serious work.

Like, share, monetize. Diogo.@gmail.com. So you have to know how to differentiate what it is. influencer, what is a journalist, what is analyst, right? Put everything in its place.

Let's go, everyone! Question, two points, question, comment, colon, comment. It hasn't been monetized yet. Do That's it now. What is the value? Anyone. There are no advertisers, therefore no monetization. It has the recognition of those who matter. You are the one who keeps those who deserve it. On air, on air. You're the one who monetizes it. Then

Monetize your game. @gmail.com. Let's go, people. Comment. While chatting with a friend, He said it's possible Lula could win. First round because it will raise funds. votes from PT, PSOL, PCO, Centrão, left, Caviá, etc. Flávio will divide with others. Oh, before I answer, I'm going to ask you a favor. Go for it last time.

Election research and check the percentages of what you just quote. based on their research, which It is not even a reference to reality. I'll be back later. The analysts themselves The media says that Lula has arrived at that's its limit, it won't grow any more. To the second-round projections practically They don't transfer votes to him.

Then check it out. The research itself is misleading, will answer your question. Diogo asks: "Can the synicton give a "With a stroke of the pen, can we change the way elections are held?" Legally, no. The main point now is not It's about what they could or couldn't do. point of view Regarding the violation of rights, right? That's because now

There is a map of consequences. All of isolation that I anticipated that they They would suffer, in fact, it happened. They no longer have protection. international, nor supranational, Nothing, right? It doesn't have it, as I said it wouldn't have it. It no longer has regional support, it doesn't. To the their violations are exposed at a level

global. So you have Italy. recognizing it as political persecution, Spain recognizes this as persecution. policy. Poland as persecution Politics, Argentina as persecution politics, the shield of the Americas, the political persecution. The United States, political persecution, with episodes concrete instances of rights violations in other countries. In this context, any abusive action It has international consequences.

Given the constant flirting between the current government and terrorist factions international in the current concept, that expands the impact map in Portuguese clearer. When the president's son He was a consultant for a company that laundered. money with Comando Vermelho, It appears in negotiations like we have Seen now. Including this Victor group. Trying to buy Daniel Vorcaro's bank.

with the money that was there. in Dubai, where we already know that the Bank of Vorcar sent money from the factions. terrorists from Brazil, including transactions linked to the "resbolar" (a Brazilian slang term for a type of transaction involving the use of spooling), which Actually, it also appeared in Italy, didn't it? A uniquely Brazilian investigation. Italy

also identified a company linked to Resbolá, negotiating with Daniel Vorcaro's Bank, Chamber of Direct Compensation in Yan and Company. In this context, it is clear that any new arbitrary action, especially regarding This relates to electoral law, which It's in direct focus, it has weight. OK Remember that we all have crises. diplomatic procedures there prevented the diplomats from entering.

Americans entering here, the ones human rights and all of that also includes weight. Yes or no? Just a minute, everyone.

He understands? It's not that there can't be strokes of the pen, he can. The issue is different from others. periods when a stroke of the pen was welcomed by the European Union, it was welcomed by the UN, it was welcomed by supranational organizations as a whole, It was welcomed by the Democrats. Americans.

Unlike in the past when there was international welcome, now not only There is no acceptance, only rejection. At a time when instability is Brazil is seen as a factor destabilizing for other countries. That's the point. It means that as it stands, without the due recognition, It has consequences. including a possible victory for Lula,

incompatible with the real world, incompatible with the audience that he has, incompatible with what the streets They show it, and so on. So, the central question, I think not It's the kind of stroke of the pen they can make, Because they still wield internal power. I think the central question should be: What would or will be the

consequences for the new arbitrations that interfere with the timeline? That's the point. What else, Maria Cristina? If indeed He blocked you, oh, if you really Mular blocked you by mistake. Then you need to go to his @, look, @mularapio, are you seeing this? You'll go straight there. On YouTube, search for @mularapio. It will land on his profile, you will...

Three dots and it unlocks, okay?

What is your opinion on the unification of Elections? Why wasn't it implemented? yet? The truth is that the old model A political failure always maintained a Electoral dynamics are underway. This keeps The power of political parties. So, elections to Every two years, you always have one year. accommodation from the previous election and a

Free year. The end of the year is already here. Preparation for the next election year. AND as if the country lived in a cycle. Constant electoral process and who holds power about the electoral process or held were the political parties, both for fitted into the machine as by background and menu control electoral. So that kept one

important power dynamics for political parties. Perhaps from the point of view strategic, that might be the best reason. But I am in favor of unification of Elections too, Diego. Maybe we can do that. Starting next year, God willing. What else? What else?

I have a feeling that the TSE is coming Repeating the 22nd playbook. I have the It seems that Cásio Nunes is inactive. and without showing strength with the president of TSE. Is that correct? Well, first A lot of expectation was created on social media. about Cassio. And I warned many people here. Sometimes when I came here I would say:

"No, because Cássio will be there" and then With Cásio, the conversation is different. I He said: "Guys, it's not like that. The president The TSE (Superior Electoral Court) does not have absolute power over the elections. Decisions at the TSE (Superior Electoral Court) are made collectively. Decisions at the TSE (Superior Electoral Court) are made collectively.

collective decisions will have others ministers. Ah, but there'll also be so-and-so, everything. Well, but you're going to have ministers who are... from the TSE itself. And another, instance a that one can appeal decisions of the TSE. It is the Supreme Court. Furthermore, in a state of exception, as long as there is no

consequence for abuses in the state of Exception, what is the consequence? natural? that they seek to take legal action. in the Supreme Court all the decisions they don't want from the TSE. Then I would say: "Ah, Diogo, So nothing changes, that's not it. For smaller decisions it changes, because the cost of constantly taking it to the Supreme Court

It's tall. So, smaller things we It will be able to improve. decisions e arbitrary decisions by both sides regarding To restrict means to restrict scope and such. This has some impact. Now, for the even more decisive decisions Even though they are in the majority, they will still have room. As long as the abuse goes unpunished.

So, a lot of expectation was created. great, but it wasn't the potential that Cáo It really did. If so, then he is. inert, showing no strength. What strength! Is he going to show it? He understands? This is the First point, okay? So I don't see what is this missing force of Cáso as president of the TSI to exercise.

You can base your decisions on that Minister Alexandre Moraes was taking when he presided over the Supreme Court, but he has to Remember that Alexandre Moraes already had concentrated powers outside of Constitution, both in the inquiry of the end of the world as in the surveys of Persecution of the Bolsonaro-supporting right wing.

He already had one, he already wielded power. far above what the Constitution establishes that anyone with the support from the press. So, at the end of According to accounts, his decisions at the TSE were accessories to a very great power accumulated, he understands? The Heat cycle doesn't have that. feature. So, this is the first one.

One point I would perhaps change is the question. with regard to the booklet of 22. Yeah, again what I just said, I I think the decisions made by the pen might happen. Injustices too. The issue is that in 22 had the American Democrats supporting this. Barroso was buying acknowledging that he was asking for support from

American Democrats. there was the group of Europe was strong, China wasn't bad either. view, It was a different scenario. Today, that same arbitrary power already tends to fill the four pillars that generated Forced vacation for Nicolás Maduro. In other words, it increases the risk of vacations. coercive measures for authorities in Brazil. Do you understand me? Perfect.

At least that's how I see it. OK. What else? Answer the question. Question/comment. Answers comment. Turn your chat into a super. Say. Diogo. Are you trying to warn your people? future political peers on this maneuver of the district vote that Moraes What do you want to do? To say that despite the idea of

District voting would be good, wouldn't it? With certainty. I am in favor of voting. pure district system, including we have to first refine, mature the Brazilian society is suited for this. We need an independent candidate. I have a plan for that. No, mine independent candidacy project that You vote for 10 representatives and not for

one, to choose who who their candidate pulls in a candidacy independent. This will require of parties need to have more coherence. to continue having seats. That's it important. Yeah, so I think we We need the independent vote to bring about change. the landscape of vote-getters and the bargaining power of political parties politicians, uh, before having a vote

district, to therefore dismantle the machine Politics, right? So there is a process in that the Brazilian citizen begins to to better understand districts such as national problems interfere with that specific district. So there is a maturation process so that the People, get to that point. But I think it's a Fantastic model, it's just not the right time yet.

If the TSE (Superior Electoral Court) banned Bolsonaro from... campaign of 22 to do live streams at the Palace of Alvorada, for the sake of fairness, should prohibit Lula giving interviews or participating in Live performances in the palace itself. But not anymore he did. Yes, these actions tarnish the process. previously elected. Oh, Paul had

I was asked that exact question. Question, Diogo, Bolsonaro couldn't use the Alvorada Palace for campaigning. Lula is giving an interview to Record. That's already a taint. Perfect. Diogo got it right. everything about the conflict in Ukraine on timeline. Thanks, Newton. Thanks for the recognition, people. Ask Diogo to ask him to put it on.

Please include me in your prayers. I have a lot of faith. in this group. Sure, Helena, what? you have? Put it there for us. Oh, I don't I know what her problem is. because she didn't put it in the message, but include Helena Nogueira in your prayers You guys. Please include it there.

What else?

question. So, for now, the judges only have the threat of consequences, but the There are no consequences yet, even though nothing has happened yet. And for They keep doubling down on this, and they continue to double down. AND That's more or less it, it's not a threat. As the map of consequences is

established, It's already established. The question is no longer one, it is no longer one. the question of whether There will be consequences, but when? That's the point. They can ignore the reality, but you can't ignore it. The consequence of ignoring reality. THE The map of consequences has been drawn. including specific cases beyond

of expectation, where the consequences already They arrived. That's my point. What else? CGOS is a candidate for state representative, I am candidate for federal office. My friend Cogos is the 2203 is eight and I am 2204. I am federal, but it's a state government. What else?

Diogo, after the expansion of Maria da Penha, internet censorship, many say that it's no use voting for Flávio to put more ministers there, because they all are system. How to respond with good Arguments? That's because you're going to cast pearls before swine. right? Then you'll be casting pearls before swine. literally, because someone brings a

That's not an argument. This person isn't even willing to listen. You're losing, you're going to lose. your time. But anyway, since I read your comment, Rafa, I'm going to... I'll answer you. Expansion of the Maria da Penha Law is constitutional? No. It's easier. declare this unconstitutionality with the current ministers or with new ones

Ministers? Okay, one more reason to Vote for Flávio. Internet censorship is Constitutional or unconstitutional? AND easier to fight the unconstitutionality with these Ministers or with new ministers? Okay, the argument itself refutes the own argument. So, that alone would make voting for worthwhile. Flavio. Because if all the ministers who are It's more of the same there.

If everyone is more of the same, then one more reason to put someone in charge who will make a change the ministers. This is based on the fact that if nothing else happened besides the election of Flávio in the current circumstances, which is not It makes perfect sense for the moment. Of all

Okay, so what are the good arguments? If Everyone there is more of the same. We need four new ministers. Then you would have to explain that to her. person, which is going to be very difficult, very difficult. The entire chain of interest that needs to be addressed by a world that It changed. But that's for another date.

Oh, crazy pig, how long have you been here? It doesn't show up around here. He's alive, son. Come on, Flavio. You have to go to debates. You don't have to hide the same way. He did it yesterday. I completely disagree with your statement. of your statement. The one who hid was the Lula and hid behind the aides of

Lula, Caiado, Renan Santos and company They beat up Flavio so that he wouldn't know. got caught in the process to put Flávio's hearing there. AND not so that he would lose votes, but so that the research could say that He lost votes. When Flavio doesn't Yes, he demonstrated that whoever has The audience is Flávio, but nobody else.

Nobody went. He didn't give the opportunity to They hit him and demonstrated that the others The candidates have no proposals, because without Flávio, to hit, they didn't say anything to Nothing at all. Flávio already has presented proposals repeatedly and made himself available to debate with the If Lula goes, which Lula obviously... It doesn't.

So he didn't hide. Who It was Lula who hid, he's hiding. behind the other candidates who only They serve to spend Flávio's money, since they They have absolutely no chance of getting anywhere. none. So Flávio goes on the offensive when he should. Go up. With this, he demonstrated that they don't have an audience, that they don't

They have relevance, which they don't have. proposal, that they have no plans, that They are an ancillary line. did you understand? You need to comment more. So, dude, you He's always there, but he never comments. What else, Diogo, today's sanctions, D-Day, as reported by the Secretary of the Treasury, are Will it affect taxes or people? The two

Things, they provide a map of those involved. AND This is the most important point in my... understanding, more than impact economical, too. What else? Both Lisboa and Cogos are in the PL. AND That's it. 22038ão and 22300. What else?

Game. Valdemar, the convicted politician, felt the weight of it. from MT. authorized Abílio, José Medeiros and Companies that do not have to support or put the name of the PT member PL's role in the campaign during the election. The pressure was intense. Ah, it's over there in the woods. Thick. Now I understand.

I think it's more about showing respect to ideological alignment. What else? It's not worth the trouble. I think that was the decision. Probably. What else? These attacks came after Cassius and Mendonça vote on the expansion and to endorse censorship. How to explain that those nominated by They won't do it, will their son? I don't know what you

He's talking. What are you talking about? At what point did Cáso and Mendonça Did they vote for censorship? That I'm not knowing what you're talking about Precisely. What else?

And what defines the boundary of behavior? of the nominees are substantially the interests and consequences. I never I trust in character or in friendship, in ideological alignment of whoever it is. Whose interests The newly appointed individuals would respond by endorsing Censorship is falling around the world. whole? That's the question. What else?

I mentioned that yesterday, Liliana. I commented on this yesterday regarding BRZ Avenue. Okay within Tob's expansion plan Chinese. Take a look at the live stream of I spoke about this yesterday. What else? You Do you think Flávio is at risk of staying? ineligible? Legally, no. But if he if he does this illegally, the elections in

Brazil will not be recognized. Therefore, the government that emerges from this process The election will be illegitimate and therefore, susceptible to more incisive actions by Shield of the Americas. That's it, that's the map. What else?

I talked about this yesterday. Andrew, several yesterday and the day before yesterday. I suggest that you Go back to the day before yesterday, I talked more about it then. I'll delve into this in depth. But reinforcing Regarding the issue, it's not a question of being gradual. It needs to have the right foundations, it has to

To have a recall, you have to be a candidate. independent before, you need to have a change in interests linked to electoral process. What determines it is the Interest in voting for the sake of voting. THE Today's voting interest is not district-based. If the interest in voting is not district-based, You're going to detach the interest from the vote.

did you understand? District interest lies mostly linked to regional interests, ambulance, hospital, did you understand? So it's about adjusting the basics, there are others. Things to change before that. Then you It changes, the change matures, and so it goes. That is, it will be gradual until 2038, isn't it? Yes, but we have some bases that

They need to change sooner, you understand? I think that social maturity today It's faster than it used to be. Thanks to the internet, too. What else?

Diogo, Zema giving up to... To run for Senate in Minas Gerais. Does anything change for the PL in Minas Gerais? Look, Not much changes, right? Because if Zema runs for office after a falling out... with Flavio, It will be very difficult to argue that he has eh It will be very difficult to argue that he

He has the votes, and if he is a candidate... supporting Flávio For the national election, things change a lot. little. So I don't know how much that is. Indeed representative. I don't have mine doubts. I don't think he's going to do it. that. What else? It's closed, folks. Let's rest. Let's see if I can get in on time tomorrow

Right? If it is God's will. It got better. So, it didn't turn out that way? It became easier to See, right?

As I said, since 2019, they haven't had... audience. They depend on us to reverberate the information. Isn't that what I'm saying? Then I That's enough, folks. It's too late. Let's go rest. Is it closed?

Thanks, crazy pig. Here at home, four guaranteed votes. Thanks, everyone. As The more we manage to turn things around, the better. No, Diego, I didn't discuss tire recipes. I'm saying that he has the power to Change your vote. You didn't understand what it is. dynamic. There is a difference between the real-world voting and the perception of

votes built. I analyzed the impact. In the perception of voting, I don't vote. They are distinct things. In the vote, it's Flávio, in first round. The challenge is perception of vote. Discussing votes is like discussing tires. Discussing the perception of voting. Cool The point of discussing votes is to debate reality.

Diogo, it was Trump's tactic to tell Lula which will not interfere in the elections of Brazil? Of course. He won't. interfere. That's not a tactic at all. What's this talk about interfering? It was the Democrats who interfered in 2022, demonstrably. The driver is the one who interferes. Double standard of law enforcement. To

One applies it, the other doesn't. It was the judiciary that interfered. Brazilian when he took the biggest picture Brazilian politics from the right wing of the dispute illegally, violating treaties international. That's what interferes. THE What the United States will do is not to recognize an election with interferences. That's the point. Interfering was never on the table. That's it

Typical PT (Workers' Party) talk.

Is it closed? So, it closed. Oh, a kiss on the heart of every patriot. May God be with you. Brazil Above all, God above everyone. Let's keep the homeland free and live for it. Brazil. We are the brave non-selfie group. Brazilian people. We did not run away from fight. We do not fear those who wish us dead.

We have a strong arm beyond the United Kingdom. AND in the Constitution, in the law that we save Jair and the country. Brazil, I won't lose you. Because you got lost. There is none here. Subservience is competence. Respect for the law, respect for the constitution. respect for facts and serious work of analysis. He's not an influencer, no. There are 3

hours talking about the complexities of world, with the coherence that survives the timeline. And it is to defend the Constitution from the inside that has been torn, because I am a candidate for deputy. federal and I'm counting on you. Kiss on The heart of every patriot. Stay with God. Brazil above all. God above

of all. Until tomorrow, God willing, He'll want it. I'm gone. Brazil, I'm not going. I lost you because you lost yourself.