YouTube Instagram TikTok How it works FAQ

The fastest way to turn talking videos into clean, searchable text. Free, private and no account required.

About

Built by Rishav Raj with one goal: free transcripts for everyone.

rishav@yttotranscript.com

Transcribe

YouTube to text
YouTube with timestamps
Instagram Reels
TikTok videos

Learn

How it works
FAQ
YouTube transcripts guide

More

Chrome extension
Contact
Privacy policy
Terms of service

© 2026 YTtoTranscript. Made for creators & researchers.

Not affiliated with YouTube, Instagram or TikTok. Respect creators’ copyright.

Write a Killer Résumé in the AI Era: 5 New Rules! — Transcript · YTtoTranscript

Home/Transcripts/YouTube

YouTube Transcript

Write a Killer Résumé in the AI Era: 5 New Rules!

Jeff Su · 2,286 words · 11 min read · EN

Watch on YouTube

Share X LinkedIn WhatsApp

Below is the complete, readable transcript of Write a Killer Résumé in the AI Era: 5 New Rules! by Jeff Su on YouTube. Read the full text, copy any part you need, or generate a transcript for any video with our free tool.

Finding reliable resume advice online was already hard enough. And now that employers are using AI to screen job applications, it's only fair to ask, "Do resumes even matter anymore?" And so, I spent weeks analyzing hiring reports and academic studies from institutions like MIT and Oxford, covering more than 4,000 hiring managers and nearly 2 million

applications. And bottom line up front, I found that resumes still matter, but the rules have changed. In this video, I'll start off by sharing the five most important findings and what each one means for you. Then, I'll break down exactly what you need to do to stand out in the age of AI. Let's get started.

Kicking things off with the five key findings. First, 87% of hiring managers say their AI hiring software reads simple, text-based resumes more accurately than fancy, visual ones. Second, tailored resumes saw 84% higher interview rates, but resumes with the most keywords actually performed worse. Third, 59% of hiring managers see candidates using AI as a good sign, but

28% reject AI-heavy resumes that show little to no effort. Fourth, resumes that quantified a candidate's impact saw 75% higher interview rates than those that only described responsibilities. And fifth, 60% of hiring managers want candidates to prove their AI skills, not just list them. I've linked the sources I went through down below, along with

the prompts and bullet point examples I showcased in this video. Now, before diving into each finding, let's quickly cover the two stages your resume has to pass in this new era. Pass the AI and pass the human. Stage one, pass the AI. Basically, companies use AI to read, rank, and organize applications. So,

Transcribe another video

Paste any YouTube, Instagram or TikTok link to get a free transcript.

Free · No sign-up · Unlimited

Add to Chrome — transcribe in one click

your resume needs to be easy to process and clearly show how your experience matches the role. Stage two, pass the human. So, if we squint really hard, there is some good news in that only 6% of hiring managers say AI is the decision-maker when it comes to passing or rejecting candidates. Meaning, humans

still play a central role in hiring. So, your resume needs to take the human reader into account as well. Put simply, passing the AI gets your foot in the door, and passing the human gets your application moved forward. And the five rules we're about to cover address both parts of that equation. On that note,

rule number one, make sure the AI can read your resume. For context, while 87% of employers say their AI hiring software prefers simple, text-based resumes, an explosion of AI design tools actively encourages job seekers to stand out with graphics, icons, and large images. Since it's much easier to sell you a fancy resume template than to tell

you boring is best. Therefore, we should be optimizing our resumes for readability, not appearance. And although there is no universal file size limit across every hiring system, some tools explicitly state they cannot parse resumes larger than 2.5 megabytes. And high-quality images are one common reason files cross that limit. All this to say, even if you have all the right

qualifications for a role, none of that matters if the AI software can't even read your resume properly. So, here's what to do. First, keep the formatting intentionally boring. Use one column and conventional headings like summary, experience, education, and skills. And for God's sake, avoid skill bars like it's the plague. The one caveat is to

follow local norms. For example, in China, headshots are very common on resumes, and many employers even ask for a candidate's zodiac sign. True story. Second, export your resume as a selectable text PDF, ideally below 2.5 megabytes. A quick check is to open the PDF and see if you can highlight and copy the text. If you can't, the text

may be trapped inside an image. Moving on to rule number two, make your fit obvious. As a quick reminder, studies found that tailored resumes saw 84% higher interview rates, but resumes with the most keywords actually performed worse, which sounds contradictory until you learn the difference between keyword mapping and keyword stuffing. Keyword mapping is when you use relevant

keywords from the job description to describe work you've actually done, which is not new advice, but AI makes this process much faster. Keyword stuffing is when job seekers cram in every phrase from the job description, whether or not their experience backs it up, and AI makes this process much faster as well. Taking a closer look at

the data, we see that across nearly 2 million applications, untailored resumes had a 3.09% interview rate versus 5.71% for tailored resumes, which is also where the 84% increase from earlier comes from. In that same study, we also see resumes with the highest keyword coverage receive 21% fewer interviews compared to those with moderate

coverage. And so, in other words, using AI to over-optimize can do more harm than good. For example, imagine you're applying for a customer success role. A keyword-stuffed bullet might read, "Delivered customer support, customer service, and customer-focused communication to improve the customer experience." I wish I was kidding, but I legitimately read something like that

during my time at Google. Whereas, a thoughtfully mapped bullet would say, "Reduced customer complaints by 31% using AI to create an onboarding email sequence from help center documents." So, here's how to use AI to tailor your resume faster without keyword stuffing. First, give AI the job description and your base resume. Ask it to identify the

problems the employer needs solved, extract the skills and keywords that matter most, and only then ask AI to suggest stronger bullet points. Next, review every suggestion and keep only what you can prove. Meaning, if you can't point to a real experience that supports a keyword, remove it. So, basically, the AI is smart enough to

figure out whether you're just adding random keywords for no reason, or including keywords intentionally. And that completes stage one. The AI can now process your resume and see why you match the role. But, you still need to convince the human to pass you, which brings us to stage two. By the way, if

you want to get 1% better at AI every week, sign up for my free newsletter to receive one insanely actionable AI tip you can apply in under two minutes. Link down below. Next up, rule number three, know where AI should stop. Remember, 59% of hiring managers like to see candidates using AI, but 28% reject

AI-heavy resumes that show little to no effort. And the research shows why both can be true. A randomized experiment from MIT involving nearly half a million job seekers found that using AI to help with spelling, grammar, and wording increased the probability of getting hired by 8%. That said, a separate experiment giving applicants access to

ChatGPT made their pitches more similar and reduced evaluators' screening by up to 9%, meaning it became harder to identify who was actually more qualified. I mean, just imagine if you're the hiring manager and you read, "Spearheaded cross-functional initiatives to drive operational excellence across 20 resumes." You'd give up as well. Put simply, the

experiments show that thoughtful AI use is fine, even encouraged, while lazy prompts like, "Make my resume better." produce the same generic BS like, "Result-driven professional with a proven track record of success." that hiring managers are sick and tired of reading. So, how do you use AI thoughtfully? Here's a simple two-step process. First, focus on brain dumping

your raw thoughts for every work experience you have, and just make sure you cover three things for each. The final result, what you specifically contributed, and how you achieved it. And don't worry if the notes are a complete mess because the goal at this step is just to capture the facts, not make them sound good. For example, your

brain dump might look something like this. I compared the replies from sales and support and there were so many conflicting answers. Uh so, I wrote a refund guide that they can both use and uh once both teams used it, duplicate tickets dropped by 50% and the customers got consistent answers. Cool. Next, upload the job description along with

your rough notes and ask AI to strengthen the wording for each bullet without changing any of the underlying facts. Then, review every suggestion and only keep the language you could explain naturally in an interview. So, your final bullet point might look something like this. Decreased duplicate tickets by 50% by creating a shared refund guide

for sales and support so customers received consistent answers. To quickly recap, hiring managers and recruiters read enough resumes to spot the difference between thoughtful AI use and lazy So, do the hard thinking first, then use AI to make that thinking more clear and concise. Up next, rule number four, prove your impact with

numbers. In a nutshell, the research found resumes that quantified a candidate's impact saw 75% higher interview rates than those that only described responsibilities. And this makes perfect sense since two people can have the exact same responsibilities and yet produce completely different results. Just imagine a hiring manager reading, "Responsible for planning social media campaigns." 10 times in a

row. And the 11th resume says, "Drove a 30% year-over-year increase in short-form views over two months." It's not hard to guess which candidate stands out. Now, none of this is new. Adding metrics to your resume has been best practice for decades. What is new is that AI makes the two hardest parts much

easier. Figuring out which metrics actually matter and turning your rough notes into polished bullet points using a proven framework. Here's what that means in practice. First, upload your resume and tell AI, "Help me identify the most relevant metrics for each experience on my resume. Ask me clarifying questions if needed. This matters because a lot of candidates

assume revenue is the only metric that counts, when there are many many other ways to measure impact, such as time saved, speed, scale, accuracy, etc. Next, after you've supplied numbers you can verify, tell the AI, rewrite each bullet using Google's XYZ formula. Accomplish X as measured by Y by doing Z. Do not add or change any facts or

numbers. Building on the earlier example, a revised bullet might look something like this. Drove a 30% year-on-year increase in short-form views within 2 months by testing different video openings and repeating the best performing formats. So, the takeaway here is simple. Job seekers used to skip metrics because they either didn't know what to measure or didn't

have the time to rewrite every bullet. But now AI removes both of those barriers, turning one of the highest impact resume improvements into one of the easiest. And finally, rule number five, prove your AI skills. So, it shouldn't be surprising that 60% of hiring managers want candidates to prove their AI skills and not just list them,

right? And when we look at how they want that proof, 26% prefer an interview or task, 19% want work examples or outcomes, and 15% look for certifications or courses. On top of that, an experiment from Oxford University found that adding role-relevant AI skills increased a candidate's chance of being selected for an interview by up to 15 percentage

points. Put simply, writing ChatGPT in your skills section is not enough. You need to actually demonstrate how you use AI to solve a problem for the role you're applying for. So, here's what to do. First, whenever possible, make the first bullet under each of your experiences an AI achievement that is directly relevant to the job

description. For example, cut weekly customer feedback reporting from 2 hours to 30 minutes by using Claude Code to build a shared database with recurring issues. If you don't have a relevant workplace example yet, complete a small project for the job you want and list it under a separate project section in your resume. For example, created a customer

insights report from 100 public product reviews by using chat GPT work to identify recurring complaints, checking the themes, and recommending three improvements. Next, make your proof easy for the hiring manager to inspect by linking directly to your portfolio. Here's a real example for my friend Zara Zhang who publishes all her AI projects

on GitHub. So, any hiring manager can immediately see what she built and how she used AI. And if you have no idea what GitHub means, no problem. Simply create a Google Doc and under each project, explain the situation, how and why you used AI, and what changed as a result. Pro tip, unless you're a fresh

graduate, put your experience above your education since 86% hiring managers value relevant work experience over formal education. All right, let's quickly recap by closing the loop on the two stages. Rules one and two help you pass the AI by making your resume readable and connecting your experience to the role. Rules three, four, and five

help you pass the human by using AI thoughtfully, quantifying your impact, and proving your AI skills with real work. Now, was every finding from this video new and mind-blowing? No, not really. But hopefully, now that you've seen the data behind the advice, you can follow them with more confidence, especially now that AI is involved on

both sides of hiring. If you enjoyed this, you might want to check out my AI playlist next. See you on the next video in the meantime. Have a great one.