Dr. Markus Krall über den "menschengemachten" Klimawandel und die CO₂-Steuer.

A first-class load of nonsense, a complete disaster, a scientific fraud the likes of which we haven't seen since mainstream science claimed that the sun revolves around the earth. It's a complete swindle of people who are naive enough to mistake profiteers for independent scientists. And that's why he has no right to education taxes. The CO2

tax is also a pure education tax, which is based on believing in nonsense that has been scientifically disproven 50 times. There is no man-made climate change. That's it, so only GI (presumably referring to a specific organization or group) exists. It may be that they see it differently, but then they should come and see me.

I'll explain it to you in detail. It's not possible to model the climate the way it's claimed. You know, a little digression here: if you want to model something mathematically, you take variables, combine them, and mathematically interact these variables to understand future developments. Then the system is stochasticized, meaning it's converted to probabilities,

and then you see what happens. Basically, this works with a model of few variables, so 6 or at most 8. You can put variables into a model this way, run it, and then roughly get an idea of ​​how they interact with each other. However, if you have more than this number of variables,

rounding errors lead to a build-up of the system—this is the butterfly effect. The rounding errors that occur in the computer because it can't calculate an infinite number of decimal places mean that if you input the same data, you get completely different results. This means that you can't model a system with more than S to