La criminalización del aborto atravesada por el poder disciplinario

Hello, my name is Alien Ceballos. I am currently undertaking my supervised research internship at the university. The topic I am developing is the legalization of abortion, drawing on the contributions of Wynn and Fruko. The article that brings us together today focuses specifically on Fruko's contributions. The purpose of the article, beyond its stated objectives,

is to provide a more critical perspective on the criminalization of abortion and to glimpse the ideas and arguments that underlie this criminalization. The article is divided into two main parts. In the first part, you will find everything related to the legal and social development of abortion in our country, and in the second part, everything

developed regarding disciplinary power from the perspective of Fruko and how it permeates the criminalization of abortion. Furthermore, we question the relationship between finalization and disciplinary color, the formulation of arguments that support the prohibitionist position. We ask ourselves if there is not, in the criminalization of abortion, a disciplinary exercise over the body of the woman

and of every person with the capacity to gestate. Fruko maintains that disciplinary power has exhaustively captured the body and This implies constant control under the gaze of someone who establishes discipline as a habit. In our social context, this "someone" would be the patriarchal discourse, which acts as a regulator of social organization. It is an

organizing entity that has permeated our entire history, from time immemorial, and is also a system of oppression to which we have all been subjected in our daily lives. It establishes the norm by normalizing, that is, by defining what is normal. In this context, the female gender and the West have always been undermined, belittled, deemed