YouTube Instagram TikTok How it works FAQ

The fastest way to turn talking videos into clean, searchable text. Free, private and no account required.

About

Built by Rishav Raj with one goal: free transcripts for everyone.

rishav@yttotranscript.com

Transcribe

YouTube to text
YouTube with timestamps
Instagram Reels
TikTok videos

Learn

How it works
FAQ
YouTube transcripts guide

More

Chrome extension
Contact
Privacy policy
Terms of service

© 2026 YTtoTranscript. Made for creators & researchers.

Not affiliated with YouTube, Instagram or TikTok. Respect creators’ copyright.

영어독해 이렇게 했더니 한글처럼 읽혔습니다 — Transcript · YTtoTranscript

Home/Transcripts/YouTube

YouTube Transcript

영어독해 이렇게 했더니 한글처럼 읽혔습니다

빡쌤 · 2,788 words · 14 min read · EN

Watch on YouTube

Share X LinkedIn WhatsApp

Below is the complete, readable transcript of 영어독해 이렇게 했더니 한글처럼 읽혔습니다 by 빡쌤 on YouTube. Read the full text, copy any part you need, or generate a transcript for any video with our free tool.

realized it only after I had finished reading an English book by myself. The reason you can't understand reading comprehension no matter how many movies you watch is precisely because of the five-form poems. The person who introduced this is a British teacher, and seriously, we really need to expose them. I'll show you. He loves

you. You will never be able to read like this for the rest of your life, breaking it down into subject, verb, and object . I have to interpret it twice, going back and forth. Divide subject and verb once. It takes twice as long to interpret it exactly as it appears. Because of this, I also had to cut off time, so I

always missed my exams. But the funny thing is, the instructor just scribbled out the translation as soon as he saw the sentence. How smart is that person to interpret it that fast ? It turned out it was n't because of high intelligence, but because it contained all the hints of the verb . For example, he

told me. Nobe just disbands and that's it . Then, when you look at the charter behind, you get flustered. Uh, what is this? Are you trying to decorate Yu? I'll waste 10 seconds worrying about this. But experts never worry about things like this. why? The verb at the beginning tells the meaning that follows. Even

just looking at Toldman, it seems like who to say what will come out later. I predict it this way . Thanks to that, who is Yu? How is "daejeol" read? Since you read the back exactly as the verb in front instructed, it becomes a forward axe moving straight from front to back . Ultimately, this is the core of verb prediction, but it

is impossible to develop this through lectures. Honestly, even I, a seasoned veteran, didn't succeed just by watching lectures . After reading the English book 10 times, I memorized the verb and the last syllable as setters, so I could immediately predict what came after it just by looking at the verb. In fact, there

Transcribe another video

Paste any YouTube, Instagram or TikTok link to get a free transcript.

Free · No sign-up · Unlimited

Add to Chrome — transcribe in one click

are thousands of English verbs, and the last syllable is different for each verb. It's tough. Then can't I just memorize all those thousands of sets ? It's too proportionate. However, after doing the syntax practice 10 times, I found that every English sentence could be explained in exactly seven ways. If you memorize just these 7 sets, you can

immediately predict the syllable ending just by looking at the verb . This way, you won't have to go back and forth, and it will help you move straight forward from front to back . If you want to figure it out on your own, you have to read the example sentences avidly like me. You

would need to watch the video to the end and read it 10 times to get the hang of it, so let's reduce that to just reading it once. This is the first set target set of all time. There are verbs that give the feeling of needing an object. For example, kill. Predict that when killing someone, a

target affected by the verb's action will appear . The reason this is a rewritten version is that even though it looks complicated with things like Tubo, Jeongsa, ing, and Daejeon at the end, it basically processes everything into a single block called Target, including Albano. see. Nobe only restricts the line and doesn't predict what will happen next. So, when you actually

read the rest, you get flustered. Spend 10 to 20 seconds thinking about whether this is the goal or not . But you do that worry at the exam venue. In the end, I ran out of time and ended up wasting the sentence. However, Ubase stops proposing and predicts. Ah, a target is going to appear behind me.

Then, the 'Sala' at the end is read as a block called 'Target'. The math teacher restricts going to Seoul at age 16. Even if you don't know the gerund grammar at all, it makes sense to interpret it because it is a target. You just need to attach it to the target like a target.

organize. Memorize that a target follows these target verbs as a set. However, among the target verbs, if the meaning includes "to give," it is the verb "give." give. Then, the gift that will be given will appear after this, right? Look at this sentence . Gijuda. Hmm, since I predict a target will appear later,

this chocolate is read as the target, or rather, a gift. The interpretation of "I give chocolate" is somewhat lacking. Whether you lost to a boyfriend or a girlfriend, there is no one to receive it. As such, the recipient and the gift follow the verb 'give' in succession. They were making it sound complicated, saying things like it's an indirect object or a direct object.

Look at this sentence. Novices try to interpret verbs as soon as they see them . told. I only interpret it. I don't think about the future. Then, looking to the right, he becomes flustered. Uh, what is it? Does the rental company set up the company? I get confused, so I spend time until I understand

. However, Juventus doesn't just do Todd's commentary; since he says he's giving it, it implies that he's giving it, so he even predicts that a gift will come out with the guy receiving it later . Thanks to that, the entire amount The Company receives is read as a gift . I said. Just

attach it to the company as if it were a gift, and that's it . The point is to just call it a gift, even if you don't know the grammar of whether this long paragraph is complete or incomplete . To summarize, these donation verbs emerge. Memorize the recipient, the gift, and the interpretation of adding 'eul' as a

set. However, there are also verbs that have no object at all. I call this a non-target verb. A prime example is flying. It has enough meaning even without a target. So, instead of the subject, additional information that supplements the meaning of time, place, and method—such as when, where, and how— comes afterward. For example, don't

memorize things like whether something is a preposition, an adverb, or an ly; just take everything as additional information regarding time, place, and method . For example, Nove interprets it excellently and that's it. Because there is no idea that the latter is everything. These three things that were done separately. On the contrary, exile flew. Ah, it

's a non-verb that doesn't need a subject. The time, place, and half-crime will probably come out later. I predict. Seeing it in person, the method of the place of elegance cutting through the sky at dawn, ah, the additional information is correct. If interpreted, the bird flew. You just need to add additional information to the preceding information that a bird flew elegantly across the sky at dawn

. Okay, let's wrap things up. Such non-target verbs are followed by additional information related to time, space, and method . Attach that to the front . Memorize this reaction as a set, just like a Big Mac, fries, and cola . However, among non-target verbs, the case where the meaning happens to be exactly the same is precisely the equal

verb. That equal equation is correct in the class equations . The essence is the same forwards and backwards. So, it is predicted that the exact same state as before will appear later. For example, Nobe became. I only set the line and then get flustered by the dispatch report. Uh, is this a verb?

Which one is the verb? However, experts predict that since it became, the same state will appear later. Thanks to that, 'dispointed' doesn't look like a verb and is read as the same state. He became. In a state of disappointment over an unexpected result, if the following is a noun, add 'to' or 'in the form of', and if it is an adjective,

add 'in the form of' or 'in the form of' to maintain the sense that the front and back are the same. Teacher, you have to memorize everything. Even foreigners don't really know this kind of nonsense. In their heads, this one and this one are exactly the same. Just visualize in your head that the front and back are the

same. organize. When such an equal verb appears, the same state follows. Memorize these three as a set. However, there are sometimes exceptions where the prediction doesn't work . Look at this sentence. Cut. chop. We'd need to figure out what to cut first, right? hmm. Smooth. Far from being an object, only adjectives came out. My

prediction that a winner would appear was wrong. Normally, the cut is supposed to apply force to the target. But since there is no target, this power flows backward. Right to the subject. Therefore, when interpreting, the meaning of being confused is added, just like in the passive voice . It's not "cutting," but "being

cut." Likewise, make, break, build. It seems like a target should appear later, but there is no target. Then, the subject itself receives power from the verb, and the meaning changes. see. To be made, to be broken , to be built. It implies that oneself changes collectively. So, in this case, exceptionally, please view it as a self-conjugating verb rather than a target verb. Since

you have changed, results must follow . Look at the example. In this sentence, Nobe and exile diverge. Nove swelled up . I always interpret it like a target verb . You expect an object to follow, but you are confused because there is no noun. However, the expert notices that since there is no object after 'a brok', '

brok' is a self-conjugating verb . Thanks to that, you can read everything that follows as a result. The glass shatters. So that's why it ended up in a shattered state due to the shock . Since it reads the back as the result, it transitions smoothly from left to right. organize. For these self-conjugating verbs, interpret them by adding a result,

attaching the meaning of "where" to the verb, and inserting the causal clause. Memorize these three as a set. However, conversely, it changes an object other than itself . It is the target verb. If you were to speak frankly, this is a real lesson. When a bad guy gets a proper education, he turns into a good person, doesn't he? It's the same.

After a verb describing a change in an object, the target and its changed form— that is, the result—appear in succession. For example, help. Hmm, a target will probably come after that. If you can predict just this much, you're a Grade 4. Only the power is read as the target, and the rest isn't read. However, the exile was successful

. Ah, because you helped, respond with a verb that changes the subject. So, they even predict that the target and the result will come out later. The power of thanks is the target, and the rest is read as the result. I did. So he finished the project on time. How about that? Since we insert it in the middle and

process it as a result, the forward movement works much better, right? However, if you confine this to a grammatical track of object or purpose, you won't be able to make progress, and the interpretation will become rigid . Wait, can I trust this? The source is a research paper. The original meaning of "help, cause, reserve"

implies the meaning of causality. So, feel free to insert the cause and effect and run the interpretation. Even the causative verb "red make," which I memorized so diligently in middle school, is very easy to read. see. If you're a beginner, you might ask, " Made is a verb, so why is 'clean' another

verb?" I'm confused and walking back and forth trying to decide on a seat, and it's already been 10 seconds. On the other hand, experts react by saying that 'made' is a verb of change and predict that the target and result will follow . So, Earth is read as the target and the rest as the result

. The teacher made it. So we cleaned the classroom after half the class. Since I interpreted it as a result, there is no need to go back. organize. These object- changing verbs are followed by two: a target and a result . Interpret it by incorporating cause and effect, just like a result . Memorize these three as a set

. However, the target might not change . This is the last object invariant verb. Typically, consider it. For example, did Suzy become beautiful because I consider her beautiful? No. She was, by nature, the very definition of beauty . As such, the object-invariable verb 'd' appears as an object and the same state. Look at the example. Nove

found. He handles the target well like this, but spends 10 or 20 seconds debating whether the following 'ing' modifies the power or not . However, Juven instinctively realized that 'found' is an invariant verb, so he figured the state following it would be exactly the same as the object . Thanks to this prediction, power is the

target, and the rest is read as being in the same state . My mother found it. That he is alone in the light. As long as you preserve the essence of the same state, it doesn't matter what ending you attach. It's okay to use a few sets. But the problem is that the

same state appears for a very long time afterwards. If the latter part gets this long, I end up forgetting all the earlier information while interpreting it. In that case, please connect it to the previous administration. His mother found him standing alone in the rain, in tears . You're skipping this connection and moving on to the next sentence. The

interpretation is completely off. organize. After such object-invariant verbs, a state identical to the target appears. Treat it as a state where the front and back are identical, but if it becomes long, attach the front. This verb, the verb ending, and the interpretation method form a set. But Mr. Park, I really can't predict that. It

's hard to predict when a verb has multiple meanings. For example, if you look at just 'get,' when we say it has no meaning, an object follows it. However, since it also has the meaning of 'to deal with,' the same state can follow it . that's right. It is difficult to predict at this stage

. So, many instructors tell you to look at the subsequent content, go back to the beginning, and determine the meaning of the verb. Hey, who has the time to sit around like that in a real match? If you go back like this, you run out of time and end up blowing away that weapon.

I'll tell you the solution. When interpreting verbs like this, do n't just predict the syllable; think of the verb's meaning based on that syllable as a set. You just need to decide which set to choose from the bundled sets: Get (obtain), Set 1; Get (become), Set 2. This is exactly the interpretation method of a veteran who has read through Shintaes 10 times. I

spoon-fed you all the 7 sets I discovered while paddocking alone so you wouldn't have to go through the trouble. About 98% of the sentences are explained by these seven. Now, buy a book like Cheonyumun and just classify them based on the 7 sets . Even if you only play 2 or 3 times, you will

internalize this set concept and the forward axe will be able to break through . That's a hassle, too. I have classified as many sets as possible for each verb and organized them in a strict online community. But honestly, I want to properly internalize it . Just come to the tough regular class. Most instructors just endlessly teach the five sentence patterns, and there were hardly any

who went as far as covering verb-specific sets like I did. Anyway, next time I’m going to upload everything from interpretation methods, including this forward axe, to problem-solving techniques, so please like and subscribe in advance. That's all for now. This is the Essence of CSAT Fever Box. [music]