Estética trascendental

Good evening. In this video, we're going to work on a text we've already discussed previously: Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Here, we'll focus on the transcendental aesthetic. We saw in that general description of the Critique of Pure Reason that transcendental aesthetics studies sensibility, which is the faculty that receives data from the senses,

applies forms of space and time, and produces phenomena. That's the general description we saw. Now, we're going to delve deeper into transcendental aesthetics in this video. One of the things we've seen is that knowledge begins with experience, but it's not identical to it. That is to say, we can't reduce knowledge to experience; there are

other elements that don't come from experience. If knowledge were reduced to experience, we couldn't account for either universality or necessity in science. Universality and necessity require an element that isn't related to experience. So, it's important to understand that knowledge necessarily involves elements that don't come from experience, because experience is limited to... Here and now, we

seek and conceive of science as universal and necessary knowledge. Experience is rather contingent, so where does this universality and necessity contained in science come from? Khan is then forced to go beyond experience, that is, to identify elements that do not come from experience. But then, if we are to take that what does

come from experience, something is given to us; yes, something is imposed upon our consciousness, and we receive it. That is to say, we are passive before that something; we receive it. Yes, that is the first step in that reception. If you remember that Khan is explaining here human reason, this transcendental subject, and one of the