Debate católico vs protestante: Rincón Apologético vs Pastor Eduardo Gutiérrez completo

But how great, how great that I have this here. Okay, well, first, first, let me tell you that I was dying to get in. I've been wanting to get in for a long time now. Now, to be honest, I was lying in bed when I got a message with the link to the live stream you were

doing, and I tuned in for a little while. And to be honest, I didn't think it was good at all. Your argument, and I like to talk about it, so, well, that's it. Could you repeat, if you'd like, my answer? The video you're playing, Eduardo, is based on the request you made. You said, "

Well, I'd like you to present a single oral tradition regarding Jesus that has remained in the oldest documents of the Church." That was basically the request, and I brought you some of them. Could you repeat the objection you 're raising regarding Clement's first point, please? Okay, I'll repeat it, of course. Here's the

version: I think you're mistaken in defining what the words of Christ are because, you see, it seems that's what I perceive the words of Christ as: what he said. When he was in his earthly ministry, say for three years, what he revealed to the apostles were not the words of Christ. Therefore, when someone talks

about the divisions or problems that would arise among the bishops and the need to appoint bishops and their successors, that is completely parallel to understanding that what the apostles said was also the word of Christ. The apostle Paul himself said in Galatians chapter 1, verse 5, that what he had received he had not received from

any man. Therefore, it did not come through tradition. And look, he literally quoted the words of Christ in 1 Corinthians regarding the Lord's Supper, and he literally recited what Christ said. Therefore, he had a very strong knowledge, a powerful revelation of the words of Christ, and this did not come to him through oral tradition. So, my