Atheist accept that #debate #atheist #atheistvschristian #charlesdarw...

You are standing on the foundation that humans are just random accidents. They come from sheer cosmic chaos. But I don't feel that way about evolution. Do you believe in Darwinism? Do I believe in human evolution? Yes, Darwinism. So survival of the fittest. Darwinism? Yes, so whatever. So in your worldview, it's okay to slaughter those that are weaker than you.

That's not what survival of the fittest is. I'm excited that I get to explain to you what the idea of survival of the fittest is. It's actually not about we're going to go kill people. Survival of the fittest is actually completely random. What survival of the fittest means is this fish, once upon a time, developed a limb.

And the fish that developed a limb lived more than the fish that didn't develop a limb. That's survival of the fittest. It's not all the other fish ganging up with spears and killing the fish with a limb. That's not what survival of the fittest is. Survival of the fittest is actually random in that evolution selects for evolutionary traits that have an evolutionary advantage that will then go on into the future generations and have an advantage.

Are you confident that you're right? In evolution? Mm-hmm. I feel very confident in my understanding of evolution. Yeah, but that's because being an atheist allows you the opportunity to have doubt because we like the idea that if something changes, that we'll change our opinion on it. You're the one who doesn't have any place for change.

I'm the one who says, yeah, things can change. Of course they can. So one day it could be okay to slaughter and take away children from their families. That could be okay one day if we evolve that way. I don't know. Ask the Trump administration.